Pieter Marthinus Oosthuijzen
omstreeks 1796 – ? · Oosthuizen line
Name
- Baptismal name
- Pieter Marthinus
- Given
- Pieter Marthinus
- Surname
- Oosthuizen
The formal baptismal name and the name a person was actually called are both kept, and neither is derived from the other. Spelling drift between records is evidence, not noise.
Naaste familie
- Father
- Ockert Oosthuizen (b.1755)
- Mother
- Susanna Catharina van Tonder
- Brothers and sisters
-
- 1784Jacobus Johannes Oosthuizen (b.1784)
- 1784~Susanna Elizabeth OOSTHUIZEN
- 1784Susanna Elizabeth Oosthuyzen
- 1786Ockert Almero Oosthuizen
- 1787Dina Magdalena Oosthuizen (b.1787)
- 1789Diena Magdalena Oosthuizen
- 1790Catherina Jacoba Oosthuizen
- 1791Cornelia Petronella Oosthuizen
- 1792Cornelis Andries Oosthuizen
- 1794Gerrit Adriaan Oosthuijzen
- 1799Roelof Adolph Oosthuizen
- 1801Susanna Johanna Oosthuizen
- 1802Susanna Johanna Oosthuizen
- 1803Susanna Maria Oosthuizen
- 1807Daniel Jacobus Johannes Oosthuijzen
- ·Roelof Oosthuyzen
- ·Susanna Johanna Oosthuyzen
- Married
- Catharina Elisabeth Schoeman
'n Lewe in die rekord
- omstreeks 1796 gebore Born
Wat ons nie weet nie
- Geen sterfdatum is aangeteken nie.
- Geen gedateerde rekord bind hierdie mens aan 'n bepaalde stuk grond nie.
A sourced gap beats an unsourced fill. These are the open questions on this person, stated rather than papered over.
Navorsingsnotas
[FamilySearch, 29 Jul 2026] Brother of the root ancestor.
[31 Jul 2026] MERGED PER-000351 into this row. Both rows carry FamilySearch id KF5S-CB5, so they are one person. Kept PER-000146 ('Pieter Marthinus OosthuijzenH'); merged PER-000351 ('Pieter Marthinus OosthuijzenH'). Exposed by the _FID backfill of 31 Jul 2026, which gave nearly every person an id to collide on; before that these had no shared key. Check KF5S-CB5 on FamilySearch before assuming the upstream tree needs anything - it is usually the LOCAL tree that is stale (LEAD-0021). Moved across: tree id=. DISAGREEMENTS, kept rather than resolved - the FamilySearch id settles these in one click: surname: kept 'Oosthuizen', PER-000351 said 'Oosthuijzen'; birth_edtf: kept '1795', PER-000351 said '1796-03-27'.
[31 Jul 2026 SRC-092] THE 1809 INVENTORY OVERTURNS MY MERGE CHOICE OF THIS MORNING. MOOC8/28.63, taken 23 April 1809, lists him as heir 7, AGED 12 - which puts his birth between 24 Apr 1796 and 23 Apr 1797. In the merge with PER-000351 I kept '1795' and discarded '1796-03-27'; the discarded value is far closer to the register than the one I kept. Birth set to 1796~ - the inventory age is evidence but not a birth date, and 27 March 1796 would make him 13 by a month, so neither reading is clean. This is the SECOND merge disagreement from this morning that a document has now settled, and the first that has gone AGAINST the value I kept. The rule of keeping the survivor's value is a tiebreaker, not evidence, and this is what it costs.
These are working notes, not finished prose: they carry the reasoning, the corrections and the things still marked to verify. They are kept here so the page itself can read as what is known.
Die werksnotas op hierdie werf word in Engels gehou en word nie vertaal nie. Hulle verander met elke navorsingsessie, en 'n vertaling sou uit pas raak met die oorspronklike. Alles anders — die stories, die getranskribeerde dokumente en die koppelvlak — is in Afrikaans.
Elders
FamilySearch-profiel KF5S-CB5