Dina Carolina Britz

1732 – 1802 · Brits line

Verbinding met die Koup

Het in 'n huishouding op hierdie grond ingetrou: Jacobus Oosthuizen (b.1722) (1749-04-10).

• gebeurtenis Ockert Oosthuizen baptised as "Ocker"1755

Naam

Doopnaam

Dina Carolina

Voorname

Dina Carolina

Van

Britz

Die formele doopnaam en die naam waarop iemand werklik geroep is, word albei gehou, en nie een word van die ander afgelei nie. Spelling wat van rekord tot rekord verskil, is self getuienis en nie geraas nie.

Drie geslagte om hierdie mens

Werk uit hoe hierdie mens aan iemand anders verwant is →

Klik op enige naam, dan word dieselfde drie geslagte om daardie mens getrek. Daar is nie 'n stampaar hier nie, en ook nie 'n bopunt aan die boom nie: dit wys net die familie wat die naaste aan die mens staan oor wie jy lees, en 'n oop plek is 'n gaping in die rekord eerder as 'n uitspraak oor iemand.

Naaste familie

Vader

Ockert Brits

Moeder

Catharina Bastijaans Pyl

Broers en susters

Martha Elisabeth Botha

Getroud

Jacobus Oosthuizen (b.1722) 10 April 1749

Kinders

• 1751Catharina Oosthuizen
• 1753Johannes Jacobus Oosthuizen (b.1753)
• 1755Jacobus Nicolaas Oosthuizen
• 1755Ockert Jacobus Oosthuizen (b.1755)
• 1757Jacobus Petrus Oosthuizen
• 1760Gerrit Johannes Oosthuizen
• 1762Dina Johanna Oosthuizen
• 1764Marthinus Oosthuizen
• 1767Pieter Cornelis Oosthuizen
• 1769Jacobus Oosthuizen (b.1769)
• 1771Dina Johanna Magdalena Oosthuizen
• 1774Adriaan Oosthuizen
• 1777Jacoba Cornelia Oosthuizen

'n Lewe in die rekord

1. 1732 gebore Born
2. 10 April 1749 getroud Married Jacobus Oosthuizen (b.1722)
3. 1755 gebeurtenis Ockert Oosthuizen baptised as "Ocker"
   [SRC-091] Son of Jacobus Oosthuijsen and Diena Carola Brits, with OCKER BRITS and Johanna Botha as witnesses. Second son, so by the naming pattern he takes his mother's father's name - and that grandfather is standing at the font. No Almero: the family name at this point is simply Ocker, and it came
4. 1755 geleentheid Baptism of their child, Ockert Jacobus Oosthuizen (b.1755)
5. 1802 oorlede Died
6. 27 April 1802 gebeurtenis The estate of Jacobus Oosthuysen d'oude is inventoried
   [SRC-093] MOOC8/24.27. Taken at the place of the son Pieter Cornelis, where the widow was living. The old couple owned no farm: 140 sheep, Rd:s 300 cash, one enslaved man named ANTHONY VAN DE KAAP, and Rd:s 1382:5 out on loan to their own eight surviving children. Their son OCKERT - heir no. 3, the
7. undated grond Lived on it, Kleine Doornrivier Nr. 1 (Riversdale)

Grond waarop hulle op rekord is

• Kleine Doornrivier Nr. 1 (Riversdale) lived on it · undated

Stories

• mentioned Wat die datums ons alles vertel
• subject 'n Vrou se ses-en-veertig besittings
• mentioned Die Oosthuizens van die Koup
• mentioned Van Modder Fonteyn na die Koup, 1809–1841
• subject Die Oosthuizens van Swellendam, 1749–1811

Bronne

1. Baptism 1755: Ocker, child of Jacobus Oosthuijsen and Diena Carola Brits FamilySearch, "South Africa, Dutch Reformed Church Registers (Cape Town Archives), 1660-1994"; State Archives, Cape Provinceark 3:1:3Q9M-CSV8-WT5C; cc=1478678; register pages 30-31, ANNO 1755, entry 9
2. MOOC8/24.27 - Inventory of the estate of Jacobus Oosthuysen d'oude and his widow Dina Carolina Brits, taken 27 April 1802 Cape Archives (KAB), Master of the Orphan Chamber; transcription published by TANAP / Globalise (Huygens KNAW)MOOC8/24.27, {18020427} | *** THE PAGES THEMSELVES SEEN 20 Aug 2026, supplied by [FAMILY] Three openings, the item number 27 written in the margin of the first, and 'Faded Document' on the archive's own slip. ***.

Navorsingsnotas

These are working notes, not finished prose: they carry the reasoning, the corrections and the things still marked to verify. They are kept here so the page itself can read as what is known.

Die werksnotas op hierdie werf word in Engels gehou en word nie vertaal nie. Hulle verander met elke navorsingsessie, en 'n vertaling sou uit pas raak met die oorspronklike. Alles anders - die stories, die getranskribeerde dokumente en die koppelvlak - is in Afrikaans.

Oop vrae

• PER-000291 and PER-000767 are one Ockert Brits, and a false death date is what split them prioriteit 1 · LEAD-0236

  This model holds Ockert BritsM twice: PER-000767 with dates 1705-1737 off the tree, and PER-000291 with no dates at all, created because he witnessed a baptism in 1755. Merge them, once the FamilySearch correction is settled.

  Wat dit sou uitmaak Whether the Ockert BritsM of Swellendam 1760 is the Ockert BritsM of Drakenstein 1751, or his son. Until that is answered the merge is one row too wide.

• Are the Stassens of Voorbaat descended from the 1814 Oosthuizen marriage? prioriteit 1 · LEAD-0255

  Voorbaat cemetery, Ladismith (CEM-520), is more than half Stassen and repeats the name FRANS JOHANNES NICOLAAS STASSEN at 1852-1939, 1904-1984 and 1935-2000. The private tree holds one Oosthuizen-Stassen marriage: Frans Johannes Nicolaas Stassen, b. about 1789, and Petronella Hermina Jacoba Hendrika Oosthuizen, 1793-1873, about 1814. Do the Voorbaat Stassens come down from that couple?

  Wat dit sou uitmaak One document linking the 1852 Stassen to the 1814 couple. The name recurrence alone cannot do it.

• Is Jacobus Nicolaas Oosthuizen (PER-000659) a real thirteenth child? prioriteit 2 · LEAD-0114

  FamilySearch lists twelve children for Jacobus OosthuizenL b.1722 (LHLG-SXG). This model holds thirteen. Is PER-000659, born 12 November 1755, a real child, another row for one of the twelve, or somebody else's son?

  Wat dit sou uitmaak A 1755 baptism entry, or Ockert's exact birth date. If Ockert turns out to be born within about ten months of 12 November 1755, one of the two rows is wrong.

Wat die rekord kortkom

• An estate taken on ground we cannot place second order · B6 loose-doc

  DOC-0066 (MOOC8/24.27, 1802-04-27) lists a household's whole movable estate, which means officials went to where that household lived. It says “ter plaatse van Pieter Cornelis Oosthuysen (farm not named)” and no more. No parcel is attached, so the family it describes sits nowhere on the map.

  What would settle it The inventory's own heading usually names the farm and the field-cornetcy; where it does not, the deceased's quitrent or opgaaf entry for that year will. This is the shape that produced the de Bruin/Rondabel find.

Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand, each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data. The whole set is on the questions page.

Elders

FamilySearch-profiel L8Q6-XFN