Jacobus Oosthuizen (b.1769)
8 Oktober 1769 – ? · Oosthuizen line
Naam
- Doopnaam
- Jacobus
- Voorname
- Jacobus
- Van
- Oosthuizen
Die formele doopnaam en die naam waarop iemand werklik geroep is, word albei gehou, en nie een word van die ander afgelei nie. Spelling wat van rekord tot rekord verskil, is self getuienis en nie geraas nie.
Drie geslagte om hierdie mens
Werk uit hoe hierdie mens aan iemand anders verwant is →
Klik op enige naam, dan word dieselfde drie geslagte om daardie mens getrek. Daar is nie 'n stampaar hier nie, en ook nie 'n bopunt aan die boom nie: dit wys net die familie wat die naaste aan die mens staan oor wie jy lees, en 'n oop plek is 'n gaping in die rekord eerder as 'n uitspraak oor iemand.
Naaste familie
- Moeder
- Dina Carolina Britz
- Broers en susters
-
- 1751Catharina Oosthuizen
- 1753Johannes Jacobus Oosthuizen (b.1753)
- 1755Jacobus Nicolaas Oosthuizen
- 1755Ockert Jacobus Oosthuizen (b.1755)
- 1757Jacobus Petrus Oosthuizen
- 1760Gerrit Johannes Oosthuizen
- 1762Dina Johanna Oosthuizen
- 1764Marthinus Oosthuizen
- 1767Pieter Cornelis Oosthuizen
- 1771Dina Johanna Magdalena Oosthuizen
- 1774Adriaan Oosthuizen
- 1777Jacoba Cornelia Oosthuizen
'n Lewe in die rekord
- 8 Oktober 1769 gebore Born
Stories
Ander van dieselfde naam
Afrikaans naming repeats hard, and the Cape Dutch naming pattern reuses a name on purpose, a child who died young has the name given again to a later sibling. These are different people. Never match on a name alone.
Wat ons nie weet nie
- Geen sterfdatum is aangeteken nie.
- Geen gedateerde rekord bind hierdie mens aan 'n bepaalde stuk grond nie.
- 1 other person in this model carry the same name. Never match on a name alone.
A sourced gap beats an unsourced fill. These are the open questions on this person, stated rather than papered over.
Navorsingsnotas
[SRC-074] Child of Jacobus OosthuizenL (PER-000230) and Dina Carolina BritzM, Tulbagh 1749 - sibling of the root ancestor's father.
[31 Jul 2026] MERGED PER-000664 into this row. PROVEN DUPLICATE, resolved on the FamilySearch id. Both rows carry LHLG-352; an FS id names one person, so these are one person recorded twice. Created by the 31 Jul 2026 one-degree tree pull, which matched on tree id alone - and 255 model people carry no tree id, so any of them one hop from a tree-linked person was added again. Survivor is the pre-existing row; it carries the prose, sources and land links. Moved across: sex=M; tree id=. Dates sharpened from the merged row: birth_edtf 1769 -> 1769-10-08. DISAGREEMENTS, kept rather than resolved - the FamilySearch id settles these in one click: display_name: kept 'Jacobus OosthuizenL (b.1769)', PER-000664 said 'Jacobus OosthuizenL'.
*** [20 Aug 2026, SRC-093] HE IS NOT AMONG THE NINE HEIRS OF 1802, SO HE DIED BEFORE APRIL 1802 AND WITHOUT ISSUE. *** The inventory lists eight living children by name and, as the ninth heir, the children of the one who had died - which is how a Cape estate represents a predeceased child. A son who had died leaving children would therefore appear the way Marthinus does. This one appears not at all. THE DEATH DATE IS STILL UNKNOWN; what the document fixes is the LATEST it can be. Recorded as an inference from an heir list, not as a reading. [TO VERIFY]
These are working notes, not finished prose: they carry the reasoning, the corrections and the things still marked to verify. They are kept here so the page itself can read as what is known.
Die werksnotas op hierdie werf word in Engels gehou en word nie vertaal nie. Hulle verander met elke navorsingsessie, en 'n vertaling sou uit pas raak met die oorspronklike. Alles anders - die stories, die getranskribeerde dokumente en die koppelvlak - is in Afrikaans.
Oop vrae
-
Duplicate candidates from the one-degree pull, settled on FamilySearch ids
prioriteit 2 · LEAD-0035
38 people added on 31 Jul 2026 share a name AND a birth YEAR with somebody already in the model, and 32 share a name with no date at all. Are they the same people?
Wat dit sou uitmaak A full birth or baptism date on either side of a pair. Name plus YEAR is not enough here and must not be treated as enough.
Elders
FamilySearch-profiel LHLG-352