Ocker Brits

active 1755 · Brits line

Verbinding met die Koup

Het deelgeneem aan iets wat hier aangeteken is: Ockert Oosthuizen baptised as "Ocker" (1755).

Naam

Doopnaam

Ocker

Voorname

Ocker

Van

Brits

Die formele doopnaam en die naam waarop iemand werklik geroep is, word albei gehou, en nie een word van die ander afgelei nie. Spelling wat van rekord tot rekord verskil, is self getuienis en nie geraas nie.

'n Lewe in die rekord

1. 1755 gebeurtenis Ockert Oosthuizen baptised as "Ocker"
   [SRC-091] Son of Jacobus Oosthuijsen and Diena Carola Brits, with OCKER BRITS and Johanna Botha as witnesses. Second son, so by the naming pattern he takes his mother's father's name - and that grandfather is standing at the font. No Almero: the family name at this point is simply Ocker, and it came
2. 1755 getuie Was getuie by 'n doop · Ockert Jacobus Oosthuizen (b.1755)

Wie by hulle gestaan het

Wie by 'n doop, 'n testament of 'n opmeting geteken het, is nie bykomstig nie. Dit is die duidelikste oorblywende rekord van watter families naby mekaar gestaan het.

• hulle het gestaan vir Ockert Jacobus Oosthuizen (b.1755) doop · 1755
  dates known, no other trace here

Wat ons nie weet nie

• Geen geboortedatum is aangeteken nie.
• Geen sterfdatum is aangeteken nie.
• Nie een ouer is aangeteken nie, dus hang hierdie mens nie aan die boom bo hom of haar nie.
• Geen gedateerde rekord bind hierdie mens aan 'n bepaalde stuk grond nie.

A sourced gap beats an unsourced fill. These are the open questions on this person, stated rather than papered over.

Bronne

1. Baptism 1755: Ocker, child of Jacobus Oosthuijsen and Diena Carola Brits FamilySearch, "South Africa, Dutch Reformed Church Registers (Cape Town Archives), 1660-1994"; State Archives, Cape Provinceark 3:1:3Q9M-CSV8-WT5C; cc=1478678; register pages 30-31, ANNO 1755, entry 9

Navorsingsnotas

These are working notes, not finished prose: they carry the reasoning, the corrections and the things still marked to verify. They are kept here so the page itself can read as what is known.

Die werksnotas op hierdie werf word in Engels gehou en word nie vertaal nie. Hulle verander met elke navorsingsessie, en 'n vertaling sou uit pas raak met die oorspronklike. Alles anders - die stories, die getranskribeerde dokumente en die koppelvlak - is in Afrikaans.

Oop vrae

• PER-000291 and PER-000767 are one Ockert Brits, and a false death date is what split them prioriteit 1 · LEAD-0236

  This model holds Ockert BritsM twice: PER-000767 with dates 1705-1737 off the tree, and PER-000291 with no dates at all, created because he witnessed a baptism in 1755. Merge them, once the FamilySearch correction is settled.

  Wat dit sou uitmaak Whether the Ockert BritsM of Swellendam 1760 is the Ockert BritsM of Drakenstein 1751, or his son. Until that is answered the merge is one row too wide.

• When did Ockert Brits die, and who is the Ockert Brits of the 1760 roll? prioriteit 1 · LEAD-0251

  Ockert BritsM (PER-000767) is alive at Drakenstein in 1751 and stands at a baptism on 11 May 1755. A leaf headed 1759 names 'de wed: Ockert BritsM' at Swellendam. So he died between May 1755 and 1759. Who then is the Ockert BritsM heading a household at Swellendam in 1760 with a wife called Johanna, and the Okkert Brits with Johanna Gous on the 1770 roll?

  Wat dit sou uitmaak A death or estate entry naming Ockert BritsM between 1755 and 1759, and a marriage entry for the younger man. Either would separate the two outright.