← The land

Farm PAR-000040

Part of Middelwater

Vaste Water (Middelwater No. 169 Ptn 5)

5/169 on the cadastre · on record 1884–1923 · show on the map

The farm's own history, the grant, the original survey, sits on that page.

Farm number
No. 169
Portion
5
On the cadastre
5/169, portionregistered as MIDDLEWATER
District
Prince Albert
Extent, as the diagram states it
9 morgen 520 sq roods
Modern surveyed area
9.1 ha

The historic extent and the modern surveyed area are two separate measurements and are not presented here as confirming each other. The first is what a surveyor wrote on a diagram, usually in morgen. The second is what the modern cadastre draws.

Why this farm is here

J.D.J. Oosthuyson / O.A. Oosthuysen (reading uncertain) held it. 4 km from Klaarstroom.

J.D.J. Oosthuyson / O.A. Oosthuysen (reading uncertain) is on record on this ground directly. No trace needed.

Stories

What the record holds, in order

  1. 24 March 1884 ownership J.D.J. Oosthuyson / O.A. Oosthuysen (reading uncertain), J.N. Botha
    amended-title · confidence medium
  2. 1923 boundary change subdivision: from Middelwater
  3. February 1923 document SG diagram A.332/1923
    3007
  4. 6 February 1923 document surveyor report A.332/1923 (report)
  5. 26 April 1923 ownership Susanna Maria Klue
    transfer · confidence medium

Also bordered by, as the modern cadastre draws it

Ground that touches this farm on the Surveyor-General's current polygons and that none of the diagrams held here names. Derived from the geometry, not read off a document.

Documents

Scan of Surveyor-General diagram, A.332/1923, February 1923 Surveyor-General diagram, A.332/1923, February 1923
10777883.PDF
Scan of Surveyor's report, A.332/1923 (report), 6 February 1923 Surveyor's report, A.332/1923 (report), 6 February 1923
10777885.PDF

Cadastre

Surveyor-General diagram index for this parcel

Surveyor-General diagram index for the whole farm — where the original survey of this ground sits.

Research notes

Cut from Middelwater; SG A.332/1923, deed 3007. Portion 5 of farm 169 - three documents agree (DOC-0076 face "Portion 5", DOC-0039 verso "169/5", DOC-0040 "Gedeelte 5"). "Vaste Water" is the spring marked on the 1883 diagram. Extent 9 morgen 520 sq roods (DOC-0076 face and DOC-0039 verso agree). [29 Jul 2026] Own diagram and beacon report: DOC-0076/DOC-0077. [TO VERIFY] Transfer date conflict is real and unresolved: 26.4.1923 (DOC-0076's own handwritten transfer line) vs 26/5/1923 (DOC-0039's typed verso), same deed 3007 - deed 3007/1923 itself would settle it. Grantee name also differs across DOC-0076/DOC-0077 - see OWN-000057/OWN-000058. [30 Jul 2026] Matched to cadastre 5/169 on the portion number, which three documents give (DOC-0076 face, DOC-0039 verso, DOC-0040). [5 Aug 2026] THE AREA DISAGREEMENT IS RESOLVED. This note read: the diagram's 9 morgen 520 sq roods is 8.45 ha against a cadastre parcel of 10.9 ha, 29% larger. 10.9 ha is GEOM_AREA/10 000, the field found on 5 Aug 2026 to be inflated by 1/cos(lat) on 429 records; the true polygon is 9.1 ha (Shape_Area), which sg_area_ha now carries. The diagram's figure runs 7.7% low against that - a large percentage on a nine-hectare parcel, where a single misread square-rood digit moves it further than any survey error would. Identity was never in doubt and still is not. [30 Jul 2026] INDEPENDENTLY CONFIRMED, not on the portion number alone: the Lo23 survey coordinates on DOC-0040, converted from Cape Datum, place servitude beacons A and C, which sit 0.73 km NE of it in portion 4 exactly as the diagram draws them against this polygon - and that diagram letters this same ground "Gedeelte 5 (Vaste Water)". Method and the full beacon test in SRC-053.

[13 Aug 2026] Renamed to the one form this model uses for every portion - the portion's own name, then the parent farm, its number and the portion in brackets - so that a name is legible in a list, a search result and a map popup without the reader having to know which farm number is which. It read "Vaste Water (Middelwater portion)" before. Nothing about the ground changed.

The research behind this page, kept separate from it: dated working notes, open questions, and what is not yet settled.

Open questions

What the record is missing

Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand, each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data. The whole set is on the questions page.