← The land

Farm PAR-000089

Witberg No. 180

180 on the cadastre · on record 1913 · show on the map

Farm number
No. 180
On the cadastre
180, whole farmregistered as WITBERG
District
Prince Albert
Extent, as the diagram states it
7011 morgen 210 square roods
Modern surveyed area
3622.5 ha

The historic extent and the modern surveyed area are two separate measurements and are not presented here as confirming each other. The first is what a surveyor wrote on a diagram, usually in morgen. The second is what the modern cadastre draws.

Why this farm is here

Named on the boundary of ground we hold, the neighbours are how the district describes itself. 7 km from Klaarstroom.

What the record holds, in order

  1. March 1913 document SG diagram 1016/1913

Bordered by, as the diagram names them

Also bordered by, as the modern cadastre draws it

Ground that touches this farm on the Surveyor-General's current polygons and that none of the diagrams held here names. Derived from the geometry, not read off a document.

Documents

Scan of Surveyor-General diagram, 1016/1913, March 1913 Surveyor-General diagram, 1016/1913, March 1913
10701801.PDF

Cadastre

Surveyor-General diagram index for this parcel

Research notes

[31 Jul 2026 inbox] The Zwartberg ground on the southern boundary of Vrolikheid AND of Roode Els Bosch (PAR-000066) - the 1913 diagram names both, with Wilgemond, as its northern neighbours (DOC-0123). Surveyed March 1913 by K.M. von OppellM in the field cornetcy of Kredouw, beacons pointed out by C.J. SchoemanM F.C. Annotated 'Reserved for Forest purposes' on 21 January 1915, so it went out of farming into the Swartberg reserve within two years of being surveyed. The sheet's own metric stamp reads 6005.4457 ha; the modern cadastre gives 4,351.3 for the farm and 3,623.7 on the portions layer, so ground has left it since. Not reconciled.

The research behind this page, kept separate from it: dated working notes, open questions, and what is not yet settled.

Open questions

What the record is missing

Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand, each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data. The whole set is on the questions page.