← The land

Farm PAR-000070

Part of Rhemhoogte No. 125

Kareemoerhoek (Rhemhoogte No. 125 Ptn 4)

· on record 1884–1937 · show on the map

The farm's own history, the grant, the original survey, sits on that page.

Farm number
No. 125
Portion
4
Also recorded as
KareemoerhoekDIAGRAM 4241/1937, deed 13528/1937KareemoershoekSRC-436, 2023 valuation roll
District
Prince Albert
Extent, as the diagram states it
1654.0080 morgen
Modern surveyed area
1561.1 ha

The historic extent and the modern surveyed area are two separate measurements and are not presented here as confirming each other. The first is what a surveyor wrote on a diagram, usually in morgen. The second is what the modern cadastre draws.

Why this farm is here

John Peter Oosthuizen held it. 14 km from Klaarstroom.

John Peter Oosthuizen is on record on this ground directly. No trace needed.

Stories

Who stood on this ground, and how they were related

Everyone the record places here - by deed, by residence, or by burial - and the kinship between each pair of them. Two numbers are given and they are deliberately kept apart. Steps is how far apart two people are in the family graph, counting a marriage as one step. The common ancestor is the nearest one they share by blood, with the year they were born. A pair four steps apart through a couple born in the 1750s is a relationship; a pair ten steps apart through a progenitor born in the 1630s is background, because almost everybody descends from him. Read both.

1900 1925 1950 John Peter Oosthuizen 1884 Anna Margaretha Oosthuizen 1937 3 steps
Each bar is one person's time on this ground. A faded bar has no recorded end and is closed at the next arrival, which is our inference and not a date anybody wrote down. Where two people who follow each other are related within six steps, the step count is printed between them.
  1. 1884 John Peter Oosthuizen held 1884-01-25
  2. 1937 Anna Margaretha Oosthuizen held 1937-12-20
StepsBetweenNearest common ancestor by blood
3 John Peter Oosthuizen · Anna Margaretha Oosthuizen Jacobus Daniel Johannes Oosthuizen born 1823 (1+2 generations up)

Drawn from the parentage and marriages this project holds, never from a shared surname. A pair with no common ancestor here may still be related through a link nobody has recorded yet.

Before this ground was cut out

This is the history of Rhemhoogte No. 125, the farm this ground was part of until 1937. It is shown here because this ground was that farm, and separately from what follows because before the cut the record says the farm's name and not which part of it. Not everything below necessarily happened on this piece.

  1. 1873 document SG diagram verso 861/1873 (verso)
  2. 1875 document SG diagram B.876/1875 P.A.Q.2-20
  3. 1879-07-01 ownership Abel Albertus Oosthuizen (1849-10-05–1918-06-22) Perpetual Quitrent · grant · confidence medium
  4. 1901-02-02 event The skirmish at Remhoogte, and the death of Johannes Kleu [SRC-010, Rose Willis Klaarstroom cameo. TERTIARY, TO VERIFY] The Boers caught the retreating Yeomanry at REMHOOGTE, a farmstead beside the old Prince Albert road, and shot the horses from under them. Lance-Corporal J. Boyd, wounded, sheltered at Wolwekloof; Johannes Kleu, a 23-year-old unarmed rebel walking home to Aberdeen, stumbled on him and was shot dead. That night Scheepers's men stayed at BLOEMENDAL. On 5 February they slipped north across the Witteberg via Boesmanskloof, SLEUTELFONTEIN and BOTTERSKRAAL, reaching ZEEKOEGAT on 7 February and looting two shops. Four of those farms are in this model. || *** [7 Sep 2026, SRC-172 pp.11-13 and SRC-632] THE FARM IS SETTLED AND THE FAMILY IS NAMED. *** Two patrols out of Prince Albert under Capt. McDowell and Lt. Torrane rode towards Klaarstroom on 2 February, took three Boer scouts on the way, saw how many Boers held the village and turned back. 'The Boers gave chase and NEAR THE FARM REMHOOGTE began to close in.' Eight of the Yeomanry were taken with their horses shot under them; Sgt.-Maj. Jackson and Tpr. Mobsby dismounted under fire to get Col. Parke back into the saddle and Jackson was captured doing it; Corp. Boyd was fatally wounded. JOHANNES KLEU DIED IN THE HOUSE. p.13: he 'was seriously wounded and was left behind with the Du Plessis family at Remhoogte'. The family's own account is SRC-632, from Miemie de Wit (PER-002051), who was ten and in the house: the wounded Englishman hid in Wolwekloof, Kleu came upon him, and the Englishman shot him at point blank range through the chest. Her father ROELOF DU PLESSIS (PER-002050) carried him in through the back door and laid him in the room at the far end of the stoep, where he died, and buried him quietly that night. WHICH REMHOOGTE: THE QUESTION FLAGGED ON THIS ROW IS ANSWERED, AND IT IS REIM HOOGTE No. 167. The book states the distance twice and from two different informants - p.36, Anna Snyders: 'the farm Remhoogte, 40 km from Prince Albert on the Klaarstroom road'; p.45, of the grave: 'Forty kilometers from Prince Albert on the farm Remhoogte'. Measured against this project's own cadastre, Reim Hoogte No. 167 (PAR-000092) lies 36.9 km from Prince Albert in a straight line, which is about 40 km by road; Rhemhoogte No. 125 (PAR-000068) lies 46.3 km in a straight line, which cannot be 40 km by road. The grave's own coordinate, which came from eGGSA and not from the book, already sat on 167. Three independent things agree, so the affair belongs on Reim Hoogte No. 167 and the cameo's filing under Rhemhoogte No. 125 is wrong. BOYD WAS BURIED BESIDE HIM AND DID NOT STAY. p.13: 'Boyd was also buried at Remhoogte but after the war his remains were reinterred in the graveyard of the Anglican Church of the Good Shepherd at Klaarstroom.' Miemie de Wit watched it: he 'was buried 50 yards from the Boer. After the war his wife in England asked that he be reinterred. I can well remember the grave being opened.'
  5. 1931 boundary subdivision: becomes Annex Modderdrift (Rhemhoogte No. 125 Ptn 3)
  6. 1937 boundary subdivision: becomes Kareemoerhoek (Rhemhoogte No. 125 Ptn 4)

What the record holds, in order

  1. 1884-01-25 to 1937-12-20 ownership John Peter Oosthuizen (1863–1955)
    transfer · confidence medium
  2. 1937 boundary change subdivision: from Rhemhoogte No. 125
  3. 1937 boundary change subdivision: from Groot Sleutelfontein (Rhemhoogte No. 125 Ptn 2)
  4. February 1937 document SG diagram 4241/1937
    13528
  5. 20 December 1937 ownership Anna Margaretha Oosthuizen (5 October 1879–3 December 1973)
    transfer · confidence medium

Also bordered by, as the modern cadastre draws it

Ground that touches this farm on the Surveyor-General's current polygons and that none of the diagrams held here names. Derived from the geometry, not read off a document.

Documents

Scan of Surveyor-General diagram, 4241/1937, February 1937 Surveyor-General diagram, 4241/1937, February 1937
101BEH01 1937.jpg

Cadastre

Surveyor-General diagram index for this parcel

Surveyor-General diagram index for the whole farm, where the original survey of this ground sits.

Research notes

Surveyed Feb 1937 by J.F.E. Hartwig (DOC-0085): "Portion 4 (Kareemoerhoek), a portion of Portion 2 [Lot A] of the farm Rhemhoogte No 125". Transferred 20.12.1937, deed 13528, to a transferee whose typed name is faint: "... born OOSTHUIZEN, married out of community of property to ... MARINCOWITZ" [TO VERIFY] (OWN-000063). Antecedent: dgms 1316/1883 and 1350/1883, Transfer Deed 341 of 25.1.1884 in favour of J.P. OOSTHUIZEN (OWN-000062). Cadastre 4/125 measures 1,561.7 ha vs 1,654.008 mg = 1,416.7 ha - 10% apart, LEAD-0007 discipline: do not present as confirming. Neighbours: Groot Sleutel Fontein (Rem.), Noorsdoringkop, Klein Botterkraal, Klein Plaats, MIDDLE WATER, Remr of Reimhoogte, Lot E.

[3 Aug 2026, SRC-208] ITS ANTECEDENT IS NOW HELD. This row cites 'dgms 1316/1883 and 1350/1883, Transfer Deed 341 of 25.1.1884 in favour of J.P. OOSTHUIZEN' without holding either diagram. 1350/1883 is now DOC-0174: Lot A of the subdivided Portion 1, 2108 morgen 338 sq roods, surveyed by P. S. Dale in July 1883, and its face carries Transfer 341 of 25.1.1884 - the same number and the same date. Kareemoerhoek is the LOT B named as its eastern neighbour.

[3 Aug 2026] ITS DIAGRAM NUMBER, from the verso of the Portion 2 sheet: KAART 4241/1937, survey record E.771/1937. The same line gives the extent as 1654,0080 morgen and the transfer as 13528/1937 - both of which this row already carried off the face of DOC-0085 - so the identification rests on three fields agreeing, not on one.

[13 Aug 2026] Renamed to the one form this model uses for every portion - the portion's own name, then the parent farm, its number and the portion in brackets - so that a name is legible in a list, a search result and a map popup without the reader having to know which farm number is which. It read "Kareemoerhoek (Rhemhoogte Ptn 4)" before. Nothing about the ground changed.

The research behind this page, kept separate from it: dated working notes, open questions, and what is not yet settled.

Open questions

What the record is missing

Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand, each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data. The whole set is on the questions page.