Roodeklip No. 26 (Uniondale)
· on record 1832 · show on the map
- Farm number
- No. 26
- Modern surveyed area
- 1825.9 ha
Why this farm is here
Here because an open question in this record is about it; who held it is not yet established. 80 km from Klaarstroom.
- document A document in the collection describes this ground DOC-0359
- document A document in the collection describes this ground DOC-0360
- lead An open question in this record is about this ground Read KAB CO 4008 p.32 and CO 4044 p.64 - the Roode Klip memorials that name Salomon Terblans, the Erasmus brothers and 'Mosasfontein'
- lead An open question in this record is about this ground Antoniesberg farms of 1850 not yet on the map: Dwaas, Wanhoop, Naugasfontein, Klein Grobbe
What the record holds, in order
- 1832 document SG diagram 352/1832
- 1832 document SG diagram verso 352/1832 (verso)
Also bordered by, as the modern cadastre draws it
Ground that touches this farm on the Surveyor-General's current polygons and that none of the diagrams held here names. Derived from the geometry, not read off a document.
- E Misgund No. 25 (Uniondale)
- SE Farm No. 478 (Uniondale)
- S Moerasfontein No. 27 (Uniondale)
- S Mordenaarsberg No. 81 (Uniondale)
- W Georgida Laagte No. 36 (Uniondale)
Documents
Cadastre
Surveyor-General diagram index for this parcel
Research notes
A NEIGHBOUR OF MOERASFONTEIN No. 27 (PAR-000305), whose polygon it touches in the national cadastre; added while tracing de Modder Fonteyn (PAR-000065). PREQUEL GROUND under 9a, never core. Diagram 352/1832 (DOC-0359): 3000 morgen of government ground applied for by SALOMON TERBLANS STEPH:ZN, called Roode Klip; east the place Misgunst, south-west 'Moerasfontyn', lettered 'Loanplace Moerasfontyn' on the face. Geo.Q. 5-42. North of Moerasfontein on the 1880 resurvey (DOC-0344).
[16 Sep 2026] ITS HISTORY FROM THE COLONIAL OFFICE PAPERS, via a 2012 family blog (SRC-650, citing KAB CO 4008 p.32 and CO 4044 p.64, not yet seen): Roode Klip, 9000 morgen, 'contiguous to Mosasfontein, Orgida and Misgunst', held by Salomon Terblans since 30 June 1832 at £2 rent together with 'Oudebos'; sold by Terblans to Stephanus Erasmus, who trekked out of the colony without taking transfer; recommended for forfeiture 11 May 1842; bought 8 December 1842 by Jan (Johan Nicolaas Wilhelm) Barkhuysen from the agent of the late S.P. Erasmus for £284, as 'Rodeklip No 341'; Barkhuysen died there in 1852 and the family still held it in 2012. [TO VERIFY] against the CO originals.
The research behind this page, kept separate from it: dated working notes, open questions, and what is not yet settled.
Open questions
-
Read KAB CO 4008 p.32 and CO 4044 p.64 - the Roode Klip memorials that name Salomon Terblans, the Erasmus brothers and 'Mosasfontein'
priority 1 · LEAD-0352
A 2012 family blog (SRC-650) quotes Colonial Office papers of 1841-1849 on the loan place Roode Klip, 'contiguous to Mosasfontein, Orgida and Misgunst', held by Salomon Terblans from 30 June 1832 with 'Oudebos', sold to Stephanus Erasmus. Do the originals also say who held Moerasfontein, and when it was granted?
What would settle it A document naming Moerasfontein with its holder in the 1820s-1840s, or its first quitrent title.
-
Antoniesberg farms of 1850 not yet on the map: Dwaas, Wanhoop, Naugasfontein, Klein Grobbe
priority 3 · LEAD-0361
Which modern farm numbers are the 1850 farms around Moerasfontein that J.G. le Roux names and the HSRC map on p. 152 draws, and that the cadastre does not hold under those names? DWAAS is in the CSG index as Dwaas No. 428 (Uniondale), with Dwaasberg No. 414 beside it, but neither is in the provincial cadastre pull. WANHOOP, NAUGASFONTEIN (Frederik Salomon Terblanche, b. 1807, in 1850) and KLEIN GROBBE (Hendrik Johannes Nel) return nothing from the CSG index under any spelling tried (Wan Hoop, Naugas, Noagas, Nougasfontein, Naauwgas, Grobbe, Grobbelaars).
What would settle it A diagram or quitrent title that gives the 1850 name against a farm number.
What the record is missing
-
Nobody is on record as ever having held this
third order · B8 never-held
Roodeklip No. 26 (Uniondale) is in the model and drawn on the map, and carries no ownership record of any kind, not a grant, not a transfer, not an occupation.
What would settle it The Surveyor-General's diagram for the farm number names the grantee and the date; the deed reference on it opens the transfer chain.
Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand,
each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data.
The whole set is on the
questions page.