← The land

Farm PAR-000327

Roodeklip No. 26 (Uniondale)

· on record 1832 · show on the map

Farm number
No. 26
Modern surveyed area
1825.9 ha

Why this farm is here

Here because an open question in this record is about it; who held it is not yet established. 80 km from Klaarstroom.

What the record holds, in order

  1. 1832 document SG diagram 352/1832
  2. 1832 document SG diagram verso 352/1832 (verso)

Also bordered by, as the modern cadastre draws it

Ground that touches this farm on the Surveyor-General's current polygons and that none of the diagrams held here names. Derived from the geometry, not read off a document.

Documents

Scan of Surveyor-General diagram, 352/1832, 1832 Surveyor-General diagram, 352/1832, 1832
10467436.TIF
Scan of Diagram verso, 352/1832 (verso), 1832 Diagram verso, 352/1832 (verso), 1832
10467438.TIF

Cadastre

Surveyor-General diagram index for this parcel

Research notes

A NEIGHBOUR OF MOERASFONTEIN No. 27 (PAR-000305), whose polygon it touches in the national cadastre; added while tracing de Modder Fonteyn (PAR-000065). PREQUEL GROUND under 9a, never core. Diagram 352/1832 (DOC-0359): 3000 morgen of government ground applied for by SALOMON TERBLANS STEPH:ZN, called Roode Klip; east the place Misgunst, south-west 'Moerasfontyn', lettered 'Loanplace Moerasfontyn' on the face. Geo.Q. 5-42. North of Moerasfontein on the 1880 resurvey (DOC-0344).

[16 Sep 2026] ITS HISTORY FROM THE COLONIAL OFFICE PAPERS, via a 2012 family blog (SRC-650, citing KAB CO 4008 p.32 and CO 4044 p.64, not yet seen): Roode Klip, 9000 morgen, 'contiguous to Mosasfontein, Orgida and Misgunst', held by Salomon Terblans since 30 June 1832 at £2 rent together with 'Oudebos'; sold by Terblans to Stephanus Erasmus, who trekked out of the colony without taking transfer; recommended for forfeiture 11 May 1842; bought 8 December 1842 by Jan (Johan Nicolaas Wilhelm) Barkhuysen from the agent of the late S.P. Erasmus for £284, as 'Rodeklip No 341'; Barkhuysen died there in 1852 and the family still held it in 2012. [TO VERIFY] against the CO originals.

The research behind this page, kept separate from it: dated working notes, open questions, and what is not yet settled.

Open questions

What the record is missing

Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand, each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data. The whole set is on the questions page.