← The land

Farm PAR-000195

Matjes Fontein No. 712

· on record 1885 · show on the map

Farm number
No. 712
District
Calvinia (division)
Extent, as the diagram states it
10340 morgen 242 sq roods
Modern surveyed area
4450.6 ha

The historic extent and the modern surveyed area are two separate measurements and are not presented here as confirming each other. The first is what a surveyor wrote on a diagram, usually in morgen. The second is what the modern cadastre draws.

Why this farm is here

Ground a written history is set on. 282 km from Klaarstroom.

Stories

What the record holds, in order

  1. 1885 document SG diagram 1908/1885

Documents

Scan of Surveyor-General diagram, 1908/1885, 1885 Surveyor-General diagram, 1908/1885, 1885
10055127 712.jpg

Research notes

[10 Aug 2026, SRC-370/DOC-0284] A MATJESFONTEIN IN THE CALVINIA DIVISION, AND NOT THE ONE. This row was created as the birthplace of Frans Jacobus Wilhelmus van der MerweL (PER-000762, b. 24 March 1863) and the identification was withdrawn the same day; three separate arguments against it are recorded below. THE HEADING SAID OTHERWISE UNTIL 18 AUG 2026 - the withdrawals sat eight hundred characters further down, so a reader met the claim first and the retraction last, which is the fault the Citrusdal rows were corrected for on the same day. S.G. 1908/1885 calls it 'the farm called MATJES FONTEIN AND ZWARTLANDS LEEGTE', 10340 morgen 242 roods of Crown Land, FIELDCORNETCY OF SOUTH ONDER ROGGEVELD - a third cornetcy, after Tygerhoek's Voor Hantam and Oude Muur's Onder Bokkeveld. Surveyed for Wm. de Smidt by E. B. Watermeyer; examiner Max Jurisch, the same man who examined Middelwater's 1883 resurvey. Beacons pointed out to Field Cornet's Assistant A. W. S. LOUW. Title Clv. Q. 16-3 of 23.1.1893. Bounded N by Annex Matjes Vley South, S by Ram Kraal, E by Leeuwen Kuil and Zand Kraal, W by Water Valley and Annex Krans Fontein. Stamped GEKANSELLEER, superseded by kaart 3256/1958. THE CADASTRE SPELLS IT MATJESFONTEIN, WITHOUT THE I. This project searched for Matjiesfontein and found nothing; the farm was there all along under the other spelling.

[10 Aug 2026] THIS FARM IS NOT ESTABLISHED AS THE BIRTHPLACE. The row was created this morning with a note tying it to PER-000762's birth in 1863; that tie rested on the name and the district and nothing else. There are at least twelve Matjiesfonteins in the Northern Cape, five of them in the FRASERBURG division, and The sheet and the farm are real and stay; the identification is withdrawn. LEAD-0151.

[11 Aug 2026] MEASURED: this farm lies 111.6 km from Oude Muur, which makes it the second furthest of the seven Calvinia Matjesfonteins from the ground this family held. Three others - 601, 791 and 679 - lie within 24 km of Oude Muur. It was entered here because it was the Matjesfontein this project found first, not because anything tied it to the family, and the withdrawn pin stays withdrawn. LEAD-0151.

[16 Aug 2026, MED-000104] A THIRD ARGUMENT AGAINST THIS FARM, and it comes from outside the family papers. The Calvinia museum panel draws a Matjes Fonteijn among the district's old farms in the SOUTH-WEST, just north of Lokenburg and beside Oorlogskloof. This farm is at longitude 20.44; Lokenburg is at 19.18 and Oude Muur at 19.29. 120 km apart. The withdrawn identification stays withdrawn.

[18 Aug 2026] AND NOW THERE IS A BETTER CANDIDATE ON THE MAP BESIDE IT. PAR-000280, MATJESFONTEIN No. 791, lies in the ONDER BOKKEVELD - the same field cornetcy and drostdy as Lokenburg, where Anna Jacoba LouwM died - about 21 km from it, against this farm's 112 km. Its 1834 diagram is read (SRC-477) and its holder, Daniel Jacobus Louw Danielszoon, owed Anna Jacoba's mother rd 2,000 (SRC-368). None of that identifies a birthplace either, and both farms stay on the map as what they are: candidates, one much closer than the other.

The research behind this page, kept separate from it: dated working notes, open questions, and what is not yet settled.

Open questions

What the record is missing

Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand, each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data. The whole set is on the questions page.