Elandsfontein (Rondabel No. 124 Ptn 6)

6/124 on the cadastre · on record 1921 · show on the map

The farm's own history, the grant, the original survey, sits on that page.

Farm number: No. 124
Portion: 6
On the cadastre: 6/124, portionregistered as RONDABLE
District: Prince Albert
Extent, as the diagram states it: 2705 morgen 257 sq roods
Modern surveyed area: 2317.0 ha

The historic extent and the modern surveyed area are two separate measurements and are not presented here as confirming each other. The first is what a surveyor wrote on a diagram, usually in morgen. The second is what the modern cadastre draws.

Why this farm is here

Almero Jacobus Hitge Oosthuizen held it. 15 km from Klaarstroom.

Almero Jacobus Hitge Oosthuizen is on record on this ground directly. No trace needed.

story A written history is set on this ground Rondabel No. 124: a farm history
parcel Cut out of Rondabel
border Shares a boundary with Hartebeest Voedpad (Rondabel No. 124 Ptn 5) Hartebeest Voedpad (Rondabel No. 124 Ptn 5)
document A document in the collection describes this ground DOC-0047

Stories

about this farm Rondabel No. 124: a farm history
From a loan-farm widow who signed with a mark to the Marincowitz farm of today: the full documented history of Rondabel No. 124 - the Venter household of 1829, the twelve-farm grant day of 1841, the Oosthuizen-Theron partnership of 1868, the 1910-34 subdivisions, and the two graves by the huis nobody has read.

What the record holds, in order

1921 boundary change subdivision: from Rondabel
10 March 1921 document beacon report 891/1921
1872-23-208
8 July 1921 ownership Almero Jacobus Hitge Oosthuizen (18 January 1878–29 October 1961)
transfer · confidence medium

Bordered by, as the diagram names them

S Crown Land
W Hartebeest Voedpad

Also bordered by, as the modern cadastre draws it

Ground that touches this farm on the Surveyor-General's current polygons and that none of the diagrams held here names. Derived from the geometry, not read off a document.

Documents

Scan of beacon_report, 891/1921, 10 March 1921

beacon_report, 891/1921, 10 March 1921
10767697.PDF

Cadastre

Surveyor-General diagram index for this parcel

Surveyor-General diagram index for the whole farm — where the original survey of this ground sits.

Research notes

SG Dgm 891/1921. Transferred to A. Oosthuizen, 8 July 1921 - almost certainly the same Almero J.H. OosthuizenM [TO VERIFY].

[3 Aug 2026, SRC-248] Beacon report No. 891/1921, J.A. Loubser, 10 March 1921: "Beacon report Elandsfontein, portion of Rondable. 1872-23-208." Beacons D' and E are cairns three and a half feet by three; the line E-A' is fenced and beaconed off, and the corner of that fence produced is a wooden pole serving as a corner beacon. The deed reference 1872-23-208 is the same one DOC-0044 carries for Hartebeest Voedpad, so the two beacon reports belong to one subdivision of Rondabel worked two years apart.

[13 Aug 2026] Renamed to the one form this model uses for every portion - the portion's own name, then the parent farm, its number and the portion in brackets - so that a name is legible in a list, a search result and a map popup without the reader having to know which farm number is which. It read "Elandsfontein (Rondabel Ptn 6)" before. Nothing about the ground changed.

The research behind this page, kept separate from it: dated working notes, open questions, and what is not yet settled.

Open questions

Morgen or hectares? extent_text may be inconsistent priority 1 · LEAD-0007
Are the figures in parcels.extent_text really morgen, or are some of them hectares mislabelled as morgen?

What would settle it Reading the figure and its unit directly off the diagrams for the nine flagged parcels.

What the record is missing

The record stops in 1921 and never resumes second order · B2 trail-ends
Elandsfontein (Rondabel No. 124 Ptn 6) was worked as far as 1921-07-08, with Almero Jacobus Hitge OosthuizenL the last owner on record. 105 years follow with nothing. Who held it after that, and is it still one farm?

What would settle it The current title deed traced backwards, each transfer names the one before it, or the Surveyor-General's subdivision diagrams, which are what usually explain a farm going quiet.

Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand, each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data. The whole set is on the questions page.