Oosthuysen co-owner (unidentified)
active 1884 · Oosthuizen line · unidentified
Connection to the Koup
Held ground in this district: Middelwater (1884-03-24).
Names
- Surname
- Oosthuysen
The formal baptismal name and the name a person was actually called are both kept, and neither is derived from the other. Spelling drift between records is evidence, not noise.
A life in the record
- 24 March 1884 land Held it, Middelwater
Ground they are on record on
- Middelwater held it · 24 March 1884
What we don't know
- No birth date is recorded.
- No death date is recorded.
- Neither parent is recorded, so this person is not attached to the tree above them.
A sourced gap beats an unsourced fill. These are the open questions on this person, stated rather than papered over.
Research notes
the 'and another' on Middelwater 1884 quitrent [floruit] co-owner on the Middelwater quitrent, 24 Mar 1884 (DOC-0001); an adult in 1884, therefore long deceased.
These are working notes, not finished prose: they carry the reasoning, the corrections and the things still marked to verify. They are kept here so the page itself can read as what is known.
What the record is missing
-
The record stops in 1884 and never resumes
second order · B2 trail-ends
Middelwater was worked as far as 1884-03-24, with Jacobus Daniel Johannes OosthuizenM and Oosthuysen co-ownerH (unidentified) the last owner on record. 142 years follow with nothing. Who held it after that, and is it still one farm?
What would settle it The current title deed traced backwards, each transfer names the one before it, or the Surveyor-General's subdivision diagrams, which are what usually explain a farm going quiet.
-
43 years, and the ground changes hands to nobody we can follow
second order · B1 succession
On Middelwater, an unnamed holder is the last owner recorded from 1841-04-15, and the next entry is Jacobus Daniel Johannes OosthuizenM and Oosthuysen co-ownerH (unidentified) from 1884-03-24, 43 years later, with no person in common. DOC-0001 records the later arrival but not the 43 years before it.
What would settle it The Deeds Office transfer register for this farm between 1841 and 1884. A transfer names its predecessor in title, so one deed closes the whole gap.
-
Holds ground once, and leaves no other trace at all
second order · B5 one-trace
Oosthuysen co-ownerH (unidentified) appears in exactly one land record and nowhere else, no birth, no death, no parents, no marriage, no burial, no estate. Who was this, and which family are they?
What would settle it A death notice (MOOC 6/9) names parents, spouse and children in one sheet and is the fastest way to attach an isolated landholder. Failing that, the baptism register for the district in the right decade.
Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand,
each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data.
The whole set is on the
questions page.