← The land

Farm PAR-000170

Part of Minnies Kraal No. 112

Askop (Minnies Kraal No. 112 Ptn 1)

1/112 on the cadastre · on record 1955 · show on the map

The farm's own history, the grant, the original survey, sits on that page.

Farm number
No. 112
Portion
1
On the cadastre
1/112, portionregistered as MINNIES KRAAL
District
Prince Albert
Extent, as the diagram states it
28.8422 morgen
Modern surveyed area
23.4 ha

The historic extent and the modern surveyed area are two separate measurements and are not presented here as confirming each other. The first is what a surveyor wrote on a diagram, usually in morgen. The second is what the modern cadastre draws.

Why this farm is here

A piece of a farm already in this model. 32 km from Klaarstroom.

What the record holds, in order

  1. 1955–1956 boundary change subdivision: from Minnies Kraal No. 112
  2. August 1955–September 1955 document SG diagram 8732/55
    T/A 2302/1956

Bordered by, as the diagram names them

Also bordered by, as the modern cadastre draws it

Ground that touches this farm on the Surveyor-General's current polygons and that none of the diagrams held here names. Derived from the geometry, not read off a document.

Documents

catalogued, no scan held
Surveyor-General diagram, 8732/55, August 1955–September 1955
SCAN284 12 1.jpg

Cadastre

Surveyor-General diagram index for this parcel

Surveyor-General diagram index for the whole farm — where the original survey of this ground sits.

Research notes

[5 Aug 2026, DOC-0240] Read off the deduction table on the back of the Minnies Kraal No. 112 diagram - survey record E2090/55 - which lists all eight portions cut from the farm in the single 1955 campaign, each with its own diagram and 1956 deed. Gedeelte 1 ('Ged' is Gedeelte, Portion - : SG diagram 8732/1955, 28.8422 morgen, deed 2302/1956. The diagram itself is not held here; this row rests on the parent's deduction table. TRANSCRIPTION CHECKED AGAINST THE GROUND: the recorded extent and the modern cadastral polygon for this portion agree to within about 1%, which is what gives confidence in a faint table. The smallest of the eight by a wide margin - about 24.7 ha against 756 to 1,524 ha for the others. WHAT THE GROUND ITSELF SAYS, since the paper does not. The polygon is a plain four-cornered block about 587 m by 906 m - compactness 0.52, so NOT the long thin strip a road or water-furrow servitude would give. And it sits exactly where THREE FARMS MEET: it touches Minnies Kraal portions 2 and 8, Klipgat No. 114 portion 10, and Rietkuil No. 119 portion 1. A small compact block surveyed at a three-farm corner is the shape of a shared beacon point, a fountain or an outspan - but the deduction table gives a number and no name, diagram 8732/1955 is not held here, and the Surveyor-General's own document list for this portion returns nothing. So the shape and the position are recorded and the purpose is not guessed. [TO VERIFY - diagram 8732/1955]

[10 Aug 2026, SRC-351/DOC-0263] ITS OWN DIAGRAM, SG 8732/55, surveyed August-September 1955 and approved 16 January 1956. 'Gedeelte 1 van die plaas MINNIES KRAAL Nr 112', 28.8422 morge. THIS FARM REALLY IS MINNIES KRAAL, unlike farm 12. Boundary list off the face: Restant van die plaas RIETKUIL to the north, ASCHKOP to the west, Gedeelte 2 to the east and Gedeelte 8 to the south-west. Aschkop is Klipgat No. 114 Portion 10, PAR-000113. The file arrived hinted '12 1' and the sheet says 112; the sheet governs, 8.

[13 Aug 2026, SRC-436] NAMED FROM THE 2023 VALUATION ROLL, which gives this portion as "Askop" (24.7043 ha). This row previously read "Minnies Kraal Portion 1 (No. 112 Ptn 1)", which was a farm-and-portion label rather than a name. The roll is a rates document and good evidence for what the ground is called now; it says nothing about what it was called when the portion was cut.

The research behind this page, kept separate from it: dated working notes, open questions, and what is not yet settled.

What the record is missing

Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand, each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data. The whole set is on the questions page.