Voelfontein No. 213
213 on the cadastre · on record 1983–1984 · show on the map
- Farm number
- No. 213
- On the cadastre
- 213, whole farmregistered as VOELFONTEIN
- District
- Prince Albert
- Extent, as the diagram states it
- 3793,9051 hektaar
- Modern surveyed area
- 3815.4 ha
The historic extent and the modern surveyed area are two separate measurements and are not presented here as confirming each other. The first is what a surveyor wrote on a diagram, usually in morgen. The second is what the modern cadastre draws.
Why this farm is here
A piece of a farm already in this model. 34 km from Klaarstroom.
- parcel Consolidated out of Quaggas Poel (Klipgat No. 114 Ptn 9)
- parcel Consolidated out of Voelfontein No. 117 (superseded)
- border Shares a boundary with Wolwekraal No. 17 Wolwekraal No. 17
- border Shares a boundary with Van Aardsfontein No. 109 Van Aardsfontein No. 109
- …and 2 more, listed in full further down this page.
What the record holds, in order
-
1983–1984
document
SG diagram 864/1984
Sert.Vers'n.Titel 61244/1981
- 1983–1984 document SG diagram 864/1984 (sheet 1)
- 1983–1984 document SG diagram 864/1984 (sheet 2)
- 1984 boundary change consolidation: from Quaggas Poel (Klipgat No. 114 Ptn 9)
- 1984 boundary change consolidation: from Voelfontein No. 117 (superseded)
Bordered by, as the diagram names them
- NW Ged. 8 (Bontwater) van Klipgat Nr. 114
- N Wolwe Kraal Nr. 17, Ged. 4
- N Ged. 2 van Cyferfontein Nr. 115
- E Ged. 1 Doornkraal Nr. 116
- SE Ged. 4 van Doornkraal Nr. 116
- SE Ged. 6 van van Aardsfontein Nr. 109
- S Ged. 6 (Nieuwe Dam) van Klipgat Nr. 114
- SW Restant Ged. 4 (River Vale) van Klipgat Nr. 114
- SW Ged. 15 van Klipgat Nr. 114
- W Ged. 1 (Zout Water) van Klipgat Nr. 114
Also bordered by, as the modern cadastre draws it
Ground that touches this farm on the Surveyor-General's current polygons and that none of the diagrams held here names. Derived from the geometry, not read off a document.
- NE Cyferfontein No. 115
- NE Paardefontein (Cyferfontein No. 115 Ptn 2)
- E Doorn Kraal No. 116
- E Doorn Kraal No. 116 Ptn 1
- S Klipgat No. 114
Documents
Cadastre
Surveyor-General diagram index for this parcel
Research notes
[3 Aug 2026, SRC-201] A 1984 CONSOLIDATION (LG 864-84, approved 7 March 1984, J.K. Maree) of two things: the REMAINDER OF PORTION 9 (QUAGGAS POEL) OF KLIPGAT NO. 114 - our PAR-000112 - and THE FARM VOELFONTEIN NO. 117, an older farm off diagram 1336/61 with title 1904-45594. So this row is the modern successor that absorbed a Klipgat portion this project was already tracking, and it is what finally places Quaggas Poel on the ground. [5 Aug 2026] THE AREA DISAGREEMENT IS RESOLVED, AND THERE WAS NEVER 772 HA IN QUESTION. This note read: the diagram states 3 793,9051 ha and 'the cadastre publishes VOELFONTEIN 213 at 4 566,1 ha - 772 ha, about 20%, apart', with ground possibly added after 1984. 4 566,1 ha is GEOM_AREA/10 000, the field found on 5 Aug 2026 to be inflated by 1/cos(lat) on 429 records. The drawn polygon is 3 815,4 ha (Shape_Area), which sg_area_ha now carries, and the 1984 consolidation diagram's 3 793,9051 ha sits 0.6% under it. The diagram and the ground agree. No ground was added to 213 and the consolidation was not amended. Neighbours named on sheet 2, clockwise: Ged. 8 (Bontwater) van Klipgat 114; Wolwe Kraal 17 Ged. 4; Ged. 2 van Cyferfontein 115; Ged. 1 Doornkraal 116; Ged. 4 van Doornkraal 116; Ged. 6 van van Aardsfontein 109; Ged. 6 (Nieuwe Dam) van Klipgat 114; Restant Ged. 4 (River Vale) van Klipgat 114; Ged. 15 van Klipgat 114; Ged. 1 (Zout Water) van Klipgat 114. SEVEN of those ten are parcels this project already holds.
The research behind this page, kept separate from it: dated working notes, open questions, and what is not yet settled.
What the record is missing
-
Nobody is on record as ever having held this
third order · B8 never-held
Voelfontein No. 213 is in the model and drawn on the map, and carries no ownership record of any kind, not a grant, not a transfer, not an occupation.
What would settle it The Surveyor-General's diagram for the farm number names the grantee and the date; the deed reference on it opens the transfer chain.
Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand,
each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data.
The whole set is on the
questions page.