Part of Klipgat No. 114
Quaggas Poel (Klipgat No. 114 Ptn 9)
· on record 1984 · show on the map
The farm's own history, the grant, the original survey, sits on that page.
- Farm number
- No. 114
- Portion
- 9
- District
- Prince Albert
- Extent, as the diagram states it
- 2,137 morgen 593 sq roods
This parcel has no matched survey polygon, so it cannot be drawn on the map. That is a gap in the cadastre match, not an absence from the record.
Why this farm is here
A piece of a farm already in this model. Not yet placed on the map.
- parcel Cut out of Klipgat No. 114
- parcel Consolidated into: Voelfontein No. 213
- lead An open question in this record is about this ground People on this site linked to nothing
Before this ground was cut out
This is the history of Klipgat No. 114, the farm this ground was cut from, on a date the record does not give. It is shown here because this ground was that farm, and separately from what follows because before the cut the record says the farm's name and not which part of it. Not everything below necessarily happened on this piece.
- 1910-09 document SG diagram 1200/1911 D/G P.A.Q 6-7
- 1911 document SG diagram verso 1200/1911 (verso)
- ../1911 to 1911-09-24 ownership Louis Daniel Francois van Zyl (1832–1900) quitrent · estate · confidence high
- 1911-09-24 to 1916 ownership Louis Daniel Francois van Zyl (1832–1900) quitrent · amended title · confidence high
- undated boundary subdivision: becomes Zoutwater (Klipgat No. 114 Ptn 1)
- undated boundary subdivision: becomes Klipgat A (Klipgat No. 114 Ptn 2)
- undated boundary subdivision: becomes Lot A (Klipgat No. 114 Ptn 3)
- undated boundary subdivision: becomes Rivervale (Klipgat No. 114 Ptn 4)
- undated boundary subdivision: becomes Bulhouwer (Klipgat No. 114 Ptn 5)
- undated boundary subdivision: becomes Nieuwe Dam (Klipgat No. 114 Ptn 6)
- undated boundary subdivision: becomes Kalkgat (Klipgat No. 114 Ptn 7)
- undated boundary subdivision: becomes Bontwater (Klipgat No. 114 Ptn 8)
- undated boundary subdivision: becomes Quaggas Poel (Klipgat No. 114 Ptn 9)
- undated boundary subdivision: becomes Aschkop (Klipgat No. 114 Ptn 10)
What the record holds, in order
- 1984 boundary change consolidation: becomes Voelfontein No. 213
- undated boundary change subdivision: from Klipgat No. 114
Research notes
[1 Aug 2026 inbox] One of TEN near-equal subdivisions cut from Klipgat No. 114 and all registered in 1916 on consecutive deeds, from the deduction table on the reverse of SG Dgm 1200/1911 (DOC-0159). Named Quaggas Poel on that table, 2,137 morgen 593 square roods, deed 1916-142-8830. THE SHAPE OF IT: nine of the ten are within four morgen of 2,137, and the tenth is a 10-morgen Lot A that is almost certainly a water or building site. Ten near-equal shares registered together, on an amended title issued to the ESTATE of the late Lucas Daniel Fromon van Zyl, is an estate being divided among heirs. The same pattern as Spreeufontein's three-way 1909 split, at ten times the width. [TO VERIFY] against the 1916 transfer deeds, which would name the heirs. The portion number comes from the order of the deed numbers (8820 to 8831 against portions 1 to 10), which agrees with the legible handwritten annotations; two of those annotations are not cleanly legible and rest on the order alone. The block also appears on the FACE of the 1911 diagram as a coloured internal division, so the ten were laid out before they were registered. MODERN EXTENT WILL NOT MATCH: the cadastre's ten Klipgat polygons total about 21,717 ha against the parent's 21,379 morgen (18,312 ha), and the cadastre also carries a 15/114 that is not on this sheet. Historic morgen and modern hectares are never quoted here as confirming each other. [1 Aug 2026]
[3 Aug 2026, SRC-201] WHERE IT WENT. Diagram LG 864-84 consolidates the REMAINDER of this portion, with the older farm Voelfontein No. 117, into DIE PLAAS VOELFONTEIN NR. 213 (PAR-000132) - approved 7 March 1984, surveyor J.K. Maree. The diagram names it as "Restant van Gedeelte 9 (Quaggas Poel) van die plaas Klipgat Nr. 114", off Kaart 2087/1912 with title 1916.142.8830, which is the same 1916 deed the deduction table on DOC-0159 gives it. So the 1912 subdivision and the 1984 consolidation agree on this piece, seventy-two years apart. Note the word RESTANT: what went into 213 is what was left of portion 9 by 1984, not the whole 2,137 morgen 593 sq roods surveyed in 1912. This row still carries no polygon of its own. [TO VERIFY]
*** [3 Aug 2026, SRC-227] THIS ROW'S EXTENT IS PROBABLY WRONG. *** It carries 2,137 morgen 593 square roods, taken from the deduction table on the reverse of DOC-0159. The PRIMARY diagram for ZOUT WATER, Portion 1 (DOC-0193), states 2137 morgen 593 square roods for ITSELF - the same figure to the square rood. The parent notes call the ten portions "near-equal", so two could be close; identical to the rood is a different matter and points at a row being read off the wrong line of that table. A diagram beats a deduction table, so Zout Water keeps the figure and this one should be treated as UNCONFIRMED until Quaggas Poel's own sheet turns up. [TO VERIFY - and it bears on the 1984 Voelfontein consolidation, SRC-201, which took the Remainder of this portion]
The research behind this page, kept separate from it: dated working notes, open questions, and what is not yet settled.
Open questions
-
People on this site linked to nothing
priority 1 · LEAD-0074
Which parcels and people exist on the site as dead ends - reachable by a list, but linked to no document, story, owner or neighbour?
What would settle it For the 106 tree-derived rows, a parentage pass merged from the family-tree on tree id - which 6 already names as the direction of travel and which would connect them wholesale rather than one at a time. For the three floating names, find the document each came from and link it.
What the record is missing
-
Nobody is on record as ever having held this
third order · B8 never-held
Quaggas Poel (Klipgat No. 114 Ptn 9) is in the model, and carries no ownership record of any kind, not a grant, not a transfer, not an occupation.
What would settle it The Surveyor-General's diagram for the farm number names the grantee and the date; the deed reference on it opens the transfer chain.
Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand,
each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data.
The whole set is on the
questions page.