← The land

Farm PAR-000027

Part of Kopjes Kraal

Kromrivier (Kopjes Kraal No. 123 Ptn 1)

1/123 on the cadastre · on record 1933–1934 · show on the map

The farm's own history, the grant, the original survey, sits on that page.

Farm number
No. 123
Portion
1
On the cadastre
1/123, portionregistered as KOPJES KRAAL
District
Prince Albert
Extent, as the diagram states it
2327.9295 morgen
Modern surveyed area
1992.3 ha

The historic extent and the modern surveyed area are two separate measurements and are not presented here as confirming each other. The first is what a surveyor wrote on a diagram, usually in morgen. The second is what the modern cadastre draws.

Why this farm is here

Gert Jan Oosthuizen Marincowitz held it. 24 km from Klaarstroom.

Gert Jan Oosthuizen Marincowitz is on record on this ground directly. No trace needed.

What the record holds, in order

  1. October 1933 document SG diagram 3281/1933
  2. 1934 boundary change subdivision: from Kopjes Kraal
  3. 16 May 1934 ownership Gert Jan Oosthuizen Marincowitz (9 September 1875–8 October 1952)
    freehold · transfer · confidence medium

Also bordered by, as the modern cadastre draws it

Ground that touches this farm on the Surveyor-General's current polygons and that none of the diagrams held here names. Derived from the geometry, not read off a document.

Documents

Scan of Surveyor-General diagram, 3281/1933, October 1933 Surveyor-General diagram, 3281/1933, October 1933
10J85O01.jpg

Cadastre

Surveyor-General diagram index for this parcel

Surveyor-General diagram index for the whole farm — where the original survey of this ground sits.

Research notes

cut from Kopjes Kraal 1934; SG Dgm 3281/33; deed 1934-73-3876

[13 Aug 2026] Renamed to the one form this model uses for every portion - the portion's own name, then the parent farm, its number and the portion in brackets - so that a name is legible in a list, a search result and a map popup without the reader having to know which farm number is which. It read "Kromrivier (Kopjes Kraal Ptn 1)" before. Nothing about the ground changed.

The research behind this page, kept separate from it: dated working notes, open questions, and what is not yet settled.

Open questions

What the record is missing

Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand, each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data. The whole set is on the questions page.