← The land

Farm PAR-000007

Drooge Kloof

· on record 1833–1922 · show on the map

District
Prince Albert

This parcel has no matched survey polygon, so it cannot be drawn on the map. That is a gap in the cadastre match, not an absence from the record.

Why this farm is here

Ockert Almero Oosthuizen held it. Not yet placed on the map.

Ockert Almero Oosthuizen is on record on this ground directly. No trace needed.

Stories

Who stood on this ground, and how they were related

Everyone the record places here - by deed, by residence, or by burial - and the kinship between each pair of them. Two numbers are given and they are deliberately kept apart. Steps is how far apart two people are in the family graph, counting a marriage as one step. The common ancestor is the nearest one they share by blood, with the year they were born. A pair four steps apart through a couple born in the 1750s is a relationship; a pair ten steps apart through a progenitor born in the 1630s is background, because almost everybody descends from him. Read both.

1900 1925 Almero Jacobus Hitge Oosthuizen 1878 Ockert Almero Oosthuizen 1897 1 step
Each bar is one person's time on this ground. A faded bar has no recorded end and is closed at the next arrival, which is our inference and not a date anybody wrote down. Where two people who follow each other are related within six steps, the step count is printed between them.
  1. 1878 Almero Jacobus Hitge Oosthuizen lived on 1878 · lived on 1922-01-02
  2. 1897 Ockert Almero Oosthuizen held ../1897
StepsBetweenNearest common ancestor by blood
1 Almero Jacobus Hitge Oosthuizen · Ockert Almero Oosthuizen Susanna Catharina Oosthuizen (b.1819) born 1819 (2+1 generations up)

Drawn from the parentage and marriages this project holds, never from a shared surname. A pair with no common ancestor here may still be related through a link nobody has recorded yet.

What the record holds, in order

  1. 1833 boundary change consolidation: from Middelwater
  2. 1878 lived here Almero Jacobus Hitge Oosthuizen (18 January 1878–29 October 1961)
    farming
  3. 1897 event Ockert Almero Oosthuizen (27 November 1836–2 January 1922), Almero Jacobus Hitge Oosthuizen (18 January 1878–29 October 1961), Jan Müller (bought Klein Vallei, 1897)
    Ockert Almero Oosthuizen sells Kouwveldt - properly Klein Vallei, PAR-000088 - to Jan Muller and moves his household to his other farm, Droogekloof (PAR-000007). The same year the brandsiekwet came from Rhodes; 'die enigste goeie ding wat hy in Suid-Afrika gedoen het', the diary says, with the district protesting.
  4. before 1897 to 1922-01-02 ownership Ockert Almero Oosthuizen (27 November 1836–2 January 1922)
    owner · confidence medium
  5. 2 January 1922 lived here Almero Jacobus Hitge Oosthuizen (18 January 1878–29 October 1961)
    farming (residence per death-record informant field)

Research notes

Almero Hitge & Hendrik [29 Jul 2026, SRC-084] Corroborated: A.J. (Almero Jacobus Hitge) Oosthuizen (PER-000016) gives "Droogekloof, Prince Albert" as his residence on his father's 1922 death record - the legacy "Almero Hitge & Hendrik" note now has a primary-source anchor. Note this is the ground annexed to Middelwater in the 1833 survey (DOC-0038). [2 Aug 2026, CORRECTED TWICE - read this whole note before moving it again] (1) THE ERROR: this row carried farm_no 164 and was pinned to W052C061000000000164000000, which the cadastre names BLOEMENDAL ANNEX (1,138.2 ha). It was drawn on somebody else's farm. (2) MY FIRST CORRECTION WAS ALSO WRONG. I cleared the farm number on the reasoning that the Prince Albert division holds no farm called Drooge Kloof, so it could not be a farm. [FAMILY] Some portions carry names that are not officially recorded... drooge kloof, vischat - those are examples. *** A NAME'S ABSENCE FROM THE CADASTRE IS NOT EVIDENCE THE PLACE IS NOT REAL. *** This is a WERF NAME in local use - the house Frans's father grew up in - and the cadastre records title, not what people call the ground they live on. Vischat on Rondabel is the same class (LEAD-0018). (3) WHAT IS ACTUALLY KNOWN. The name appears twice in the paper, on two different pieces of ground: as the Government ground DROOGE KLOOF annexed into Middelwater No. 169 by Stretch's 1833 diagram (DOC-0038), and as a struck-through 'Droege Kloof' against Portion 3 of Bloemendal Annex No. 164 on that farm's deduction verso (DOC-0161), 316 morgen 257 sq rds, dgm A609/26, transferred 1926. And A.J.H. OosthuizenM gave 'Droogekloof, Prince Albert' as his residence in 1922 [SRC-084]. (4) SO IT IS NOT DRAWN. No polygon, because we do not yet know WHICH of those two grounds the family's Drooge Kloof is, and a wrong pin is worse than none. It is located by asking the family, not by searching the cadastre. See LEAD-0064. [2 Aug 2026, ANSWERED — and the answer was already in the model]. PLC-000035, 'Droge Kloof (werf)', is a homestead coordinate he supplied on 31 JULY — 33°15'16.06"S 22°32'56.38"E — and a point-in-polygon test puts it inside PAR-000001 MIDDELWATER and, within that, inside PAR-000079, MIDDELWATER PORTION 3. So of the two candidate Drooge Kloofs this row was caught between, IT IS THE MIDDELWATER ONE: the Government ground Stretch annexed in 1833 (DOC-0038), not Portion 3 of Bloemendal Annex No. 164. Still NO-POLYGON as a parcel, because a werf is a point and this row is the 1833 annexed ground rather than the house; the coordinate lives on PLC-000035 where it belongs. AND IT SHARPENS LEAD-0023: the werf stands on Middelwater Portion 3, the 4,251 ha piece no document in this collection mentions at all. A homestead called Droge Kloof on the silent portion is not proof the portion was called that, and it is the obvious name to ask the deeds office for.

The research behind this page, kept separate from it: dated working notes, open questions, and what is not yet settled.

Open questions