Anna Loots
active 1769 · Loots line
No birth date is recorded for this person. The family puts an outer limit on it: born no later than 1753, because their child born 1769, so at least 16 years earlier. That is a hard limit, it cannot be otherwise. It is an upper bound and not a birth year, and nothing in the model records it as one.
Connection to the Koup
Took part in something recorded here: Jan de Bruijn baptised (1769-04-16).
Names
- Given
- Anna
- Surname
- Loots
The formal baptismal name and the name a person was actually called are both kept, and neither is derived from the other. Spelling drift between records is evidence, not noise.
Three generations around this person
Work out how this person is related to somebody else →
Click any name and the same three generations are drawn around that person instead. There is no first couple here and no top to the tree: it is only ever the family standing closest to whoever you are reading about, and a blank is a gap in the record rather than a statement about anybody.
Immediate family
- Children
- Jan de Bruin
A life in the record
-
16 April 1769
event
Jan de Bruijn baptised
Son of Hendrik de Bruijn and Anna Loots; witnesses Willem Meijer and Elisabeth Loots. Fifty years later he is holding Rondabel in the Koup and married to an Oosthuizen. The congregation is not named on the page.
- 16 April 1769 occasion Baptism of their child, Jan de Bruin
Stories
- mentioned Two Vrolykheid farms, far apart?
What we don't know
- No birth date is recorded.
- No death date is recorded.
- Neither parent is recorded, so this person is not attached to the tree above them.
- No dated record ties this person to a specific piece of ground.
A sourced gap beats an unsourced fill. These are the open questions on this person, stated rather than papered over.
Sources
- Baptism of Jan de Bruijn, 16 April 1769 (register ANNO 1769, entry 20) FamilySearch, "South Africa, Dutch Reformed Church Registers (Cape Town Archives), 1660-1994"ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-CSV8-WTLN, cc=1478678, image 1 of 1; pages 90-91, ANNO 1769, entry no. 20
Research notes
[31 Jul 2026 SRC-168] MOTHER OF JAN DE BRUIN (PER-000048). A second Loots, ELISABETH (PER-000512), stands witness at the same baptism - very likely her sister, though the register does not say so and 9 forbids resting on a surname. Loots is a new family in this model.
These are working notes, not finished prose: they carry the reasoning, the corrections and the things still marked to verify. They are kept here so the page itself can read as what is known.
Open questions
-
Which congregation baptised Jan de Bruijn in 1769?
priority 1 · LEAD-0030
The register page (SRC-168) gives the entry in full but not the church. If it is Roodezand/Tulbagh, the de Bruin family is a Tulbagh family and the Vrolykheid name-transfer of LEAD-0010 has a documented carrier. If it is Drakenstein or Swellendam, it does not.
What would settle it The waypoint. This is a thirty-second lookup, not a research task.