← The land

Farm PAR-000302

Buffels Klip No. 63 (Uniondale)

· on record 1832 · show on the map

Farm number
No. 63
Also recorded as
Buffelsklip; Buffels Klip
Extent, as the diagram states it
2945 morgen (1832); resurveyed 1857 at 5010 morgen 511 sq roods
Modern surveyed area
1520.0 ha

The historic extent and the modern surveyed area are two separate measurements and are not presented here as confirming each other. The first is what a surveyor wrote on a diagram, usually in morgen. The second is what the modern cadastre draws.

Why this farm is here

Here because an open question in this record is about it; who held it is not yet established. 40 km from Klaarstroom.

What the record holds, in order

  1. 1832 document SG diagram 338/1832

Buried on this ground

The burials also appear on this farm's timeline above, each at its own date.

Also bordered by, as the modern cadastre draws it

Ground that touches this farm on the Surveyor-General's current polygons and that none of the diagrams held here names. Derived from the geometry, not read off a document.

Documents

Scan of Surveyor-General diagram, 338/1832, 1832 Surveyor-General diagram, 338/1832, 1832
10810648.jpg

Cadastre

Surveyor-General diagram index for this parcel

Research notes

The VELDKORNETSKAP OLIPHANTS RIVIER of the George district, named and listed on George opgaafrol J 91 (SRC-525). Added after that page identified the country the family's Olifants farms lay in. PREQUEL GROUND under 9a - the Oosthuizen road into the Koup - and NEVER `core`, so it must not move the map's opening bounds. Read by Frans in the same section.

*** [20 Aug 2026, SRC-528] THE 1832 QUITRENT DIAGRAM. *** Surveyed by A. EGIDIUS PETERSEN and described on the sheet as being in the FIELD CORNETCY OF BOVEN OLIFANTS RIVIER, DISTRICT OF GEORGE - the cornetcy this project spent 19-20 Aug hunting a district plan for. Held in shares by DAN:L A. SWART, J. G. WASSERMAN and the WIDOW OF C. J. M. ROUSSEAU. The 1857 resurveyor wrote on the sheet that Petersen's 1832 diagram was 'totally erroneous'.

The research behind this page, kept separate from it: dated working notes, open questions, and what is not yet settled.

Open questions

What the record is missing

Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand, each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data. The whole set is on the questions page.