Part of Minnies Kraal No. 112
Minnies Kraal No. 112 Ptn 3
3/112 on the cadastre · on record 1955 · show on the map
The farm's own history, the grant, the original survey, sits on that page.
- Farm number
- No. 112
- Portion
- 3
- On the cadastre
- 3/112, portionregistered as MINNIES KRAAL
- District
- Prince Albert
- Extent, as the diagram states it
- 2067,7147 morge
- Modern surveyed area
- 1775.7 ha
The historic extent and the modern surveyed area are two separate measurements and are not presented here as confirming each other. The first is what a surveyor wrote on a diagram, usually in morgen. The second is what the modern cadastre draws.
Why this farm is here
A piece of a farm already in this model. 31 km from Klaarstroom.
- parcel Cut out of Minnies Kraal No. 112
- document A document in the collection describes this ground DOC-0185
What the record holds, in order
- 1955 boundary change subdivision: from Minnies Kraal No. 112
-
August 1955–September 1955
document
SG diagram 8734/1955
T/A 2301/1956
Also bordered by, as the modern cadastre draws it
Ground that touches this farm on the Surveyor-General's current polygons and that none of the diagrams held here names. Derived from the geometry, not read off a document.
- N Minnies Kraal No. 112 Ptn 2
- NE Schilpads Vlakte No. 111
- SW Minnies Kraal No. 112 Ptn 4
- W Minnies Kraal No. 112
- W Minnies Kraal No. 112 Ptn 6
- NW Klein Minnieskraal (Minnies Kraal No. 112 Ptn 8)
Documents
SCAN286 112 3.jpg
Cadastre
Surveyor-General diagram index for this parcel
Surveyor-General diagram index for the whole farm — where the original survey of this ground sits.
Research notes
[3 Aug 2026, SRC-219] The largest of the eight 1955 portions of Minnies Kraal 112, and THE TRAKA RIVIER RUNS THROUGH IT - which is worth noting, because the Traka veldkornetskap is where most of the farms this project follows sit. Minnies Kraal came in only to settle a farm number (see PAR-000138); its position on the Traka is the first thing that argues it might belong here for its own sake.
[13 Aug 2026] Renamed to the one form this model uses for every portion - the portion's own name, then the parent farm, its number and the portion in brackets - so that a name is legible in a list, a search result and a map popup without the reader having to know which farm number is which. It read "Minnies Kraal Portion 3 (No. 112 Ptn 3)" before. Nothing about the ground changed.
The research behind this page, kept separate from it: dated working notes, open questions, and what is not yet settled.
Open questions
-
Is Minnies Kraal No. 112 named for the MINNE family - who married into the Janse van Vuuren of Wilgemond?
priority 1 · LEAD-0071
Does the farm name Minnies Kraal come from the Mienie/Minnie surname, and if so which member of that family held or occupied the ground?
What would settle it A grant, quitrent or early diagram of farm 112 naming a MINNE as occupier or grantee - the spelling on the document is itself part of the answer. Failing that, a Minne recorded on or beside that ground before the name appears on a map.
What the record is missing
-
Nobody is on record as ever having held this
third order · B8 never-held
Minnies Kraal No. 112 Ptn 3 is in the model and drawn on the map, and carries no ownership record of any kind, not a grant, not a transfer, not an occupation.
What would settle it The Surveyor-General's diagram for the farm number names the grantee and the date; the deed reference on it opens the transfer chain.
Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand,
each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data.
The whole set is on the
questions page.