Part of Wolwekraal No. 17
Swanepoel's Aanleg (Swanepoelsaanleg)
· on record 1857–1897 · show on the map
The farm's own history, the grant, the original survey, sits on that page.
- Farm number
- No. 17
- District
- Prince Albert
- Extent, as the diagram states it
- 2000 morgen (1857); 1458 morgen transferred 1879
This parcel has no matched survey polygon, so it cannot be drawn on the map. That is a gap in the cadastre match, not an absence from the record.
Why this farm is here
Jacobus Johannes Swanepoel (b6c5d7e5) held it. Connected to the Oosthuizen, Marincowitz or Van der Merwe lines BY MARRIAGE, not by blood, 6 steps on the shortest path. Not yet placed on the map.
- Jacobus Johannes Swanepoel (b6c5d7e5)
- child of Pieter Johannes Swanepoel (b6c5d7)
- married to Johanna Jacomina Petronella Catharina Venter
- child of Maria Catharina Venter
- child of Jan Louis Venter
- parent of Adriana Cecilia Venter
- parent of Johannes Adriaan Oosthuizen
Each step is a recorded parentage or marriage in this model, and the shortest one the record supports, follow the names to check it.
- story A written history is set on this ground The farm he was born on
- parcel Cut out of Wolwekraal No. 17
- parcel Cut out of Venterskraal (Wolwekraal portion)
- border Shares a boundary with Klipgat No. 114 Klipgat No. 114
Stories
- about this farm
The farm he was born on
Jan Adriaan Venter was born on Wolve Kraal in 1823, orphaned off it at five, bought it at thirty-one, halved it and named half after himself at thirty-three, and spent the next thirty-seven years selling that half away.
What the record holds, in order
- 10 March 1857 boundary change subdivision: from Venterskraal (Wolwekraal portion)
-
1857-03-10 to 1879-04-22
ownership
Jacobus Johannes Swanepoel (b6c5d7e5) (7 November 1831–?)
freehold · subdivision · confidence high
-
1879-04-22 to 1897-12-14
ownership
Frederik Hendrik Swanepoel (b6c5d7e3) (16 April 1827–8 September 1909)
freehold · transfer · confidence high
-
1879
lived here
Frederik Hendrik Swanepoel (b6c5d7e3) (16 April 1827–8 September 1909)
farming
-
14 December 1897
ownership
Willem Adriaan Venter
freehold · transfer · confidence high
Research notes
[SRC-072] Cut from Venterskraal and registered to Jacobus Johannes SwanepoelH on the same day the parent farm was split, 10 Mar 1857 (transport 151). A farm named for the family that took it. Sold out of the family 14 Dec 1897. [29 Jul 2026, verification pass] Cadastre match stripped: this parcel wore Wolwekraal No.17's whole-farm record (11,464 ha) - a 2,000-morgen portion cut from Venterskraal cannot be the whole farm. No modern record named Swanepoelsaanleg exists in the division; all of farm 17's pieces carry "WOLVE KRAAL". Left unmatched.
[1 Aug 2026, from the LEAD-0007 extent audit] EXTENT OUTLIER, FLAGGED NOT FIXED. The record says 2,000 morgen = 1,713 ha; the matched cadastre polygon is 11,464 ha, six and a half times larger. Every other disagreement in the model runs the other way, a historic whole against a modern portion. Larger reads as a match to a CONSOLIDATED modern farm that has absorbed neighbouring ground, which would make the polygon right for the name and wrong for the 2,000-morgen grant. [TO VERIFY] against the farm's own diagram and deduction table.
*** GEOMETRY WITHDRAWN 1 Aug 2026. IT WAS DRAWN AT NEARLY SEVEN TIMES ITS SIZE, ON TOP OF ITS OWN NEIGHBOUR. *** This row carries farm_no 17 and no portion, so the matcher gave it the WHOLE-FARM polygon of Wolwekraal No. 17 - the identical key PAR-000054 holds, 11,464 ha - against a recorded extent of 2,000 morgen, which is 1,713 ha. Ratio 6.7. Wolwekraal's own match is sound at 0.92, so the two rows were sharing one polygon and one of them had to be wrong. Swanepoel's Aanleg is a PORTION of farm 17, not the farm. Which portion is not determinable from what is held: the candidates in the cadastre are 4/17 at 1,392.7 ha, 5/17 at 1,351.3 ha, 12/17 at 1,349.7 ha and 11/17 at 1,592.7 ha, and none is a clean fit to either 2,000 morgen or the 1,458 morgen transferred in 1879. Guessing one would repeat the mistake that put Haggas 104 km wrong, so it carries NO-POLYGON until a diagram says. [TO VERIFY] the Wolwekraal deduction table.
The research behind this page, kept separate from it: dated working notes, open questions, and what is not yet settled.
Open questions
-
match_cadastre.py no longer reproduces the geometry on disk
priority 1 · LEAD-0017
Re-running match_cadastre.py against the current CSVs changes 11 parcels and does not reproduce what is in parcels.csv. Which is right?
What would settle it Deciding per parcel whether the script's match or the hand entry is correct, then either fixing the script's name-matching or recording the hand values as deliberate.
-
Why did Swanepoel's Aanleg leave the family in the rinderpest year?
priority 2 · LEAD-0101
Swanepoel's Aanleg was sold out of the family on 14 December 1897, to the Venter who had been buying Venterskraal fragments since 1879. Was this distress, or the last step of a deliberate re-assembly of the old Wolwekraal ground?
What would settle it The price on deed 10724, read against other transfers of the same years.
What the record is missing
-
22 years, and the ground changes hands to nobody we can follow
second order · B1 succession
On Swanepoel's Aanleg (Swanepoelsaanleg), Jacobus Johannes SwanepoelH (b6c5d7e5) is the last owner recorded from 1857-03-10, and the next entry is Frederik Hendrik SwanepoelH (b6c5d7e3) from 1879-04-22, 22 years later, with no person in common. DOC-0056 records the later arrival but not the 22 years before it.
What would settle it The Deeds Office transfer register for this farm between 1857 and 1879. A transfer names its predecessor in title, so one deed closes the whole gap.
-
18 years, and the ground changes hands to nobody we can follow
second order · B1 succession
On Swanepoel's Aanleg (Swanepoelsaanleg), Frederik Hendrik SwanepoelH (b6c5d7e3) is the last owner recorded from 1879-04-22, and the next entry is Willem Adriaan VenterH from 1897-12-14, 18 years later, with no person in common. DOC-0056 records the later arrival but not the 18 years before it.
What would settle it The Deeds Office transfer register for this farm between 1879 and 1897. A transfer names its predecessor in title, so one deed closes the whole gap.
Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand,
each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data.
The whole set is on the
questions page.