Minnies Kraal Nr. 112

112 op die kadaster · op rekord 1955 · wys op die kaart

Plaasnommer: Nr. 112
Op die kadaster: 112, heel plaasgeregistreer as MINNIES KRAAL
Distrik: Prince Albert
Grootte, soos die kaart dit stel: 11288,0094 morge
Moderne opgemete oppervlakte: 9628.3 ha

Die historiese grootte en die moderne opgemete oppervlakte is twee aparte metings en word hier nie aangebied asof hulle mekaar bevestig nie. Die eerste is wat 'n landmeter op 'n kaart geskryf het, gewoonlik in morg. Die tweede is wat die moderne kadaster teken.

Waarom hierdie plaas hier is

'n Stuk van 'n plaas wat reeds in hierdie model is. 28 km van Klaarstroom.

perseel Grond uit hierdie plaas gesny: Minnies Kraal Nr. 112 Gdlt 2
perseel Grond uit hierdie plaas gesny: Minnies Kraal Nr. 112 Gdlt 3
perseel Grond uit hierdie plaas gesny: Minnies Kraal Nr. 112 Gdlt 4
perseel Grond uit hierdie plaas gesny: Minnies Kraal Nr. 112 Gdlt 5
…en nog 2, volledig gelys verder af op hierdie bladsy.

Wat die rekord hou, in volgorde

1955 boundary change subdivision: becomes Minnies Kraal Nr. 112 Gdlt 2
1955 boundary change subdivision: becomes Minnies Kraal Nr. 112 Gdlt 3
1955–1956 boundary change subdivision: becomes Askop (Minnies Kraal Nr. 112 Gdlt 1)
1955–1956 boundary change subdivision: becomes Minnies Kraal Nr. 112 Gdlt 6
1955–1956 boundary change subdivision: becomes Nuwejaarsfontein (Minnies Kraal Nr. 112 Gdlt 7)
1955–1956 boundary change subdivision: becomes Klein Minnieskraal (Minnies Kraal Nr. 112 Gdlt 8)
Augustus 1955–September 1955 document SG diagram 8731/1955
K.G.T. 2300/1956
1955 document SG diagram verso 8731/1955 (verso)
undated boundary change subdivision: becomes Minnies Kraal Nr. 112 Gdlt 4
undated boundary change subdivision: becomes Minnies Kraal Nr. 112 Gdlt 5

Grond uit hierdie plaas gesny

Minnies Kraal Nr. 112 Gdlt 2 2/112 · 1147.5 ha
Minnies Kraal Nr. 112 Gdlt 3 3/112 · 1775.7 ha
Minnies Kraal Nr. 112 Gdlt 4 4/112 · 955.9 ha
Minnies Kraal Nr. 112 Gdlt 5 5/112 · 781.8 ha
Askop (Minnies Kraal Nr. 112 Gdlt 1) 1/112 · 23.4 ha
Minnies Kraal Nr. 112 Gdlt 6 6/112 · 756.1 ha
Nuwejaarsfontein (Minnies Kraal Nr. 112 Gdlt 7) 7/112 · 1232.1 ha
Klein Minnieskraal (Minnies Kraal Nr. 112 Gdlt 8) 8/112 · 1511.3 ha

Ook begrens deur, soos die moderne kadaster dit teken

Grond wat aan hierdie plaas raak op die Landmeter-generaal se huidige poligone en wat geen kaart wat hier gehou word, noem nie. Afgelei uit die meetkunde, nie van 'n dokument afgelees nie.

Dokumente

catalogued, no scan held

Landmeter-generaal-kaart, 8731/1955, Augustus 1955–September 1955
10513527 Minnies 1.jpg

catalogued, no scan held

Kaart se keersy, 8731/1955 (verso), 1955
10513529.jpg

Kadaster

Die Landmeter-generaal se kaartindeks vir hierdie perseel

Navorsingsnotas

[3 Aug 2026, SRC-206] *** THIS ROW EXISTS TO SETTLE A FARM NUMBER. *** Since 29 July, PAR-000052 has carried an unresolved conflict: the Willis & Atkinson cameo maps RIETFONTEIN as farm 12 on the Zeekoegat road, while our downloaded cadastre names farm 12 MINNIES KRAAL. Two 1990 SG diagrams then confirmed Rietfontein Nr 12 (SRC-202, SRC-203). This 1955 diagram closes the other half: the surveyor's title block reads "DIE PLAAS MINNIES KRAAL NR 112". So Minnies Kraal is 112, Rietfontein is 12, and the cadastre extract's "farm 12 = MINNIES KRAAL" is an error - most likely 112 keyed as 12. NO POLYGON AND NO KEY, deliberately: the farm is recorded for its NUMBER, and pinning it would mean trusting the same extract that got the number wrong. It is also outside the Klaarstroom basin - it is here as evidence, not as a farm this project follows.

[3 Aug 2026] WHO WAS MINNIE? The name has never been explained here. A Mienie/Minnie family is now documented in this district and married into two of this project's families - a van Vuuren of the Wilgemond line took Adriana Johanna Mienie as his second wife in 1836, and a Minnie born at Prince Albert in 1884 married a Swanepoel. That makes the farm name worth chasing rather than assuming. It is NOT established: the oldest document held for this farm is a 1955 diagram, which is far too late to say who it was named for. [TO VERIFY]

[3 Aug 2026, SRC-251/SRC-252] THE FARM IS NOW PLACED BY ITS NEIGHBOURS rather than by its name. Two 1955 portion diagrams list them: KLIPFONTEIN A (PAR-000083) on the south and south-west, KOPJES KRAAL and its ANNEX on the west, and WESTBOURNE on the east. Kopjes Kraal No. 123 is documented in this project from 1859 to 1934, so Minnies Kraal sits against ground already written up. The same sheets show the farm cut into at least SIX portions and a remainder by 1955, and they name a feature on the southern boundary - SCHURFTEKOPJES - which this project has not held before. None of it answers who Minnie was: 1955 is a century too late. LEAD-0071.

[9 Aug 2026] WHY THE PORTIONS OF THIS FARM FALL SHORT, AND BY EXACTLY HOW MUCH. checks.py reports farm 112's portions summing to 8,183.8 ha against this row's 9,628.3, which is 15% under. The 1955 deduction table on DOC-0240 settles what the eight portions are: they total 9,576.4082 MORGEN = 8,202.5 ha, and the modern polygons come to 8,183.8, which is 0.23% apart. EVERY ONE OF THE EIGHT AGREES WITH ITS MODERN POLYGON to within 1.1%, so nothing is double-counted and nothing is mis-converted. THE SHORTFALL IS A NINTH PIECE THIS MODEL DOES NOT HOLD: 1,444.5 ha, or 1,686 morgen, which is the REMAINDER of farm 112 left after the 1955 campaign cut Gedeeltes 1 to 8 out of it. There is no RE/112 row here. LEAD-0139.

That also confirms a reading DOC-0240 had flagged as uncertain. Its table gives Gedeelte 2 as "read here as 1330,7620" morgen; the modern polygon for Portion 2 is 1,147.5 ha = 1,339.8 morgen, 0.67% away, so the reading stands.

Werknotas, hier gewys omdat dit 'n private navorsingsbou is.

Die werksnotas op hierdie werf word in Engels gehou en word nie vertaal nie. Hulle verander met elke navorsingsessie, en 'n vertaling sou uit pas raak met die oorspronklike. Alles anders — die stories, die getranskribeerde dokumente en die koppelvlak — is in Afrikaans.

Oop vrae

Is Minnies Kraal No. 112 named for the MINNE family - who married into the Janse van Vuuren of Wilgemond? prioriteit 1 · LEAD-0071
Does the farm name Minnies Kraal come from the Mienie/Minnie surname, and if so which member of that family held or occupied the ground?

Wat dit sou uitmaak A grant, quitrent or early diagram of farm 112 naming a MINNE as occupier or grantee - the spelling on the document is itself part of the answer. Failing that, a Minne recorded on or beside that ground before the name appears on a map.
Nine diagram sheets named in the model that no longer exist on disk prioriteit 2 · LEAD-0095
Re-pull nine Surveyor-General sheets whose archive references this model records but whose images were never kept. What do their versos carry?

Wat dit sou uitmaak Re-pulling the nine files. Each then gets its OWN DOC- row per 8, never a second filename on an existing row.
Minnies Kraal No. 112 has a Remainder of about 1,686 morgen and no row for it prioriteit 2 · LEAD-0139
The 1955 campaign cut Gedeeltes 1 to 8 out of farm 112, and those eight account for 8,183.8 ha of a 9,628.3 ha farm. The missing 1,444.5 ha, about 1,686 morgen, is the Remainder. Who held it, and does it still exist as RE/112?

Wat dit sou uitmaak The RE/112 polygon and its area, or the 1956 deeds.
The cadastre gives the name MINNIES KRAAL to two different farms, 12 and 112 prioriteit 2 · LEAD-0147
The Surveyor-General's own diagrams call farm 12 Rietfontein and farm 112 Minnies Kraal. The modern cadastre calls BOTH of them MINNIES KRAAL, on 12,957 ha and 9,659 ha respectively. Which is the error, and when did farm 12 stop being Rietfontein in the register?

Wat dit sou uitmaak A deeds or SG record naming farm 12 after 1994.

Wat die rekord kortkom

Nobody is on record as ever having held this third order · B8 never-held
Minnies Kraal Nr. 112 is in the model and drawn on the map, and carries no ownership record of any kind, not a grant, not a transfer, not an occupation.

What would settle it The Surveyor-General's diagram for the farm number names the grantee and the date; the deed reference on it opens the transfer chain.

Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand, each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data. The whole set is on the questions page.