← The land

Person PER-001443

Souwa van Madagascar

about 1675 – about 1712

Three generations around this person

Souwa van Madagascar 1675

Work out how this person is related to somebody else →

Click any name and the same three generations are drawn around that person instead. There is no first couple here and no top to the tree: it is only ever the family standing closest to whoever you are reading about, and a blank is a gap in the record rather than a statement about anybody.

Immediate family

Children
Helena Catharina Siewers

A life in the record

  1. about 1675 born Born
  2. about 1712 died Died

Stories

What we don't know

A sourced gap beats an unsourced fill. These are the open questions on this person, stated rather than papered over.

Research notes

[TREE] Added 6 Aug 2026. Named on [S021] as one of the enslaved or free-black people at the head of this family, and held no row in this model until now — the site asserted the descent on a published page while the model could not answer a single question about the person. Dates as the private tree gives them; NO PLACE IMPORTED, per 5. No FamilySearch id yet: see PEOPLE-WITHOUT-FS-ID.md and LEAD-0112. S021 is itself marked provisional — this descent rests on a family tree and not yet on the Cape records — and creating the row does not change that. [TO VERIFY] S021 gives 'after 1712' for the death; recorded here as 1712~ because EDTF has no 'after' form this project uses and the tree says the same.

[15 Aug 2026, FS] FamilySearch id filled from the FamilySearch id field of the family tree exports, matched on this row's own tree id and accepted only because the tree's NAME AND YEARS agree with this row. It is a door to the sources, not a source: nothing here is taken from the profile.

[22 Sep 2026, SRC-664] FIRST FIFTY YEARS g9/p9666.htm (indexed as Soua) (Wayback snapshot 20240616090324): enslaved to the VOC and not shown as freed; ten children baptised 1689-1712, among them Helena Siebers (1690; estate MOOC8/5.3, 1727); no partner named. PROBABLE match. Her birth 'c.1675' is too late for a child baptised in 1689 and should be read as unknown. Which child the descent runs through is not yet checked. [FFY; originals it cites to pull]

These are working notes, not finished prose: they carry the reasoning, the corrections and the things still marked to verify. They are kept here so the page itself can read as what is known.

Open questions

Elders

FamilySearch profile LTNY-53M