← The land

Person PER-000292

Johanna Botha

active 1755 · Botha line

Connection to the Koup

Took part in something recorded here: Ockert Oosthuizen baptised as "Ocker" (1755).

Names

Baptismal name
Johanna
Given
Johanna
Surname
Botha

The formal baptismal name and the name a person was actually called are both kept, and neither is derived from the other. Spelling drift between records is evidence, not noise.

A life in the record

  1. 1755 event Ockert Oosthuizen baptised as "Ocker"
    [SRC-091] Son of Jacobus Oosthuijsen and Diena Carola Brits, with OCKER BRITS and Johanna Botha as witnesses. Second son, so by the naming pattern he takes his mother's father's name - and that grandfather is standing at the font. No Almero: the family name at this point is simply Ocker, and it came
  2. 1755 witness Witnessed a baptism · Ockert Oosthuizen (b.1755)

Who stood with them

Who signed at a baptism, a will or a survey is not incidental. It is the clearest surviving record of which families stood close to which.

What we don't know

A sourced gap beats an unsourced fill. These are the open questions on this person, stated rather than papered over.

Sources

  1. Baptism 1755: Ocker, child of Jacobus Oosthuijsen and Diena Carola Brits FamilySearch, "South Africa, Dutch Reformed Church Registers (Cape Town Archives), 1660-1994"; State Archives, Cape Provinceark 3:1:3Q9M-CSV8-WT5C; cc=1478678; register pages 30-31, ANNO 1755, entry 9

Research notes

[SRC-091] Baptism witness, 1755, with Ocker BritsM.

These are working notes, not finished prose: they carry the reasoning, the corrections and the things still marked to verify. They are kept here so the page itself can read as what is known.