Kliprug (Clanwilliam roll, Visagie household)
This parcel has no matched survey polygon, so it cannot be drawn on the map. That is a gap in the cadastre match, not an absence from the record.
Why this farm is here
In the model from the cadastre pull only, nothing in the record yet says who held this ground or why it belongs here. Not yet placed on the map.
What the record holds, in order
No dated record on this parcel yet. It is on the map because the Surveyor-General has a polygon for it; the history is not transcribed.
Research notes
[30 Sep 2026, SRC-704] THE VISAGIE FARM, NAMED ON THE CLANWILLIAM ROLL. The places column reads '1 Kliprug' across from entry 25, Izaak Hermanus VisagieM Pzoon and Johanna Sophia van der MerweM (PER-001856 x PER-001785). NOT PINNED, AND DELIBERATELY: the Calvinia cadastre holds TWO farms called KLIPRUG - No. 754 (3040 ha, 40.3 km from Welbedagt) and No. 778 (4306 ha, 57.2 km) - plus ANNEX KLIPRUG Nos. 755 and 757, KLIPRUG EXTENSION No. 829 and KLIPRUGS RIVIER No. 831. There is a seventh in WILLOWMORE, 390 km away, which is the usual namesake and is not this. Nothing in the roll chooses between 754 and 778. A wrong pin is worse than none, and the way to settle it is the same as for Welbedagt: a neighbour named on the same opening, or a diagram.
The research behind this page, kept separate from it: dated working notes, open questions, and what is not yet settled.
What the record is missing
-
Nobody is on record as ever having held this
third order · B8 never-held
Kliprug (Clanwilliam roll, Visagie household) is in the model, and carries no ownership record of any kind, not a grant, not a transfer, not an occupation.
What would settle it The Surveyor-General's diagram for the farm number names the grantee and the date; the deed reference on it opens the transfer chain.
Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand,
each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data.
The whole set is on the
questions page.