Lot A (Vrisch Gewagt No. 163 Ptn 1)

· on record 1904 · show on the map

The farm's own history, the grant, the original survey, sits on that page.

Farm number: No. 163
Portion: 1
District: Prince Albert
Extent, as the diagram states it: 248 morgen 340 sq roods

This parcel has no matched survey polygon, so it cannot be drawn on the map. That is a gap in the cadastre match, not an absence from the record.

Why this farm is here

A piece of a farm already in this model. Not yet placed on the map.

parcel Cut out of Vrisch Gewagt No. 163

What the record holds, in order

1904 boundary change subdivided_into: from Vrisch Gewagt No. 163

Research notes

[15 Aug 2026 inbox, SRC-441/DOC-0300] FROM THE DEDUCTION TABLE on the back of dgm B352/1833. Cut off Vrisch Gewagt and transferred in 1904 on transfer 202-13343. THE NAME IS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE SHEET: the front labels this corner "Lot A" and the table writes "Lot A" and then strikes it through for "Ptn. 1" - the registry preferring a number to a name, which 8 says to harvest against. NO POLYGON: not pulled from the cadastre, so no coordinate and no pin.

The research behind this page, kept separate from it: dated working notes, open questions, and what is not yet settled.

What the record is missing

Nobody is on record as ever having held this third order · B8 never-held
Lot A (Vrisch Gewagt No. 163 Ptn 1) is in the model, and carries no ownership record of any kind, not a grant, not a transfer, not an occupation.

What would settle it The Surveyor-General's diagram for the farm number names the grantee and the date; the deed reference on it opens the transfer chain.

Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand, each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data. The whole set is on the questions page.