← The land

Farm PAR-000177

Part of Doorn Kraal No. 116

Toornitzkraal (Doorn Kraal No. 116 Ptn 2)

2/116 on the cadastre · show on the map

The farm's own history, the grant, the original survey, sits on that page.

Farm number
No. 116
Portion
2
On the cadastre
2/116, portionregistered as DOORN KRAAL
District
Prince Albert
Extent, as the diagram states it
1447 morgen 5 square roods
Modern surveyed area
973.3 ha

The historic extent and the modern surveyed area are two separate measurements and are not presented here as confirming each other. The first is what a surveyor wrote on a diagram, usually in morgen. The second is what the modern cadastre draws.

Why this farm is here

A piece of a farm already in this model. 41 km from Klaarstroom.

What the record holds, in order

No dated record on this parcel yet. It is on the map because the Surveyor-General has a polygon for it; the history is not transcribed.

Also bordered by, as the modern cadastre draws it

Ground that touches this farm on the Surveyor-General's current polygons and that none of the diagrams held here names. Derived from the geometry, not read off a document.

Cadastre

Surveyor-General diagram index for this parcel

Surveyor-General diagram index for the whole farm — where the original survey of this ground sits.

Research notes

KNOWN ONLY FROM THE DEDUCTION TABLE on the back of diagram 1154/1863, which is the whole of the evidence: portion 2, that extent, deed 335 of 27 January 1900. No diagram for it has been seen here and it has no polygon. 8 - a deduction table is where portion names and extents live, and this row exists because the back of the sheet was read.

[7 Aug 2026] PINNED to the cadastre on key W052C061000000000116000020. The diagram gives 1447 morgen 5 square roods = 1239 ha and the modern polygon measures 1165 ha, a difference of 6%.

[13 Aug 2026, SRC-436] NAMED FROM THE 2023 VALUATION ROLL, which gives this portion as "Toornitzkraal" (1239.4090 ha). This row previously read "Doorn Kraal No. 116 Portion 2", which was a farm-and-portion label rather than a name. The roll is a rates document and good evidence for what the ground is called now; it says nothing about what it was called when the portion was cut.

The research behind this page, kept separate from it: dated working notes, open questions, and what is not yet settled.

What the record is missing

Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand, each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data. The whole set is on the questions page.