Leeuw Rivier (Venterskraal resurvey)

· on record 1937 · show on the map

The farm's own history, the grant, the original survey, sits on that page.

Farm number: No. 17
Portion: 11 of 1
District: Prince Albert
Extent, as the diagram states it: 3087.0061 morgen

This parcel has no matched survey polygon, so it cannot be drawn on the map. That is a gap in the cadastre match, not an absence from the record.

Why this farm is here

A piece of a farm already in this model. Not yet placed on the map.

parcel Cut out of Wolwekraal No. 17
parcel Resurveyed as Venterskraal (Wolwekraal portion)

Before this ground was cut out

This is the history of Wolwekraal No. 17, the farm this ground was cut from, on a date the record does not give. It is shown here because this ground was that farm, and separately from what follows because before the cut the record says the farm's name and not which part of it. Not everything below necessarily happened on this piece.

1841-04-15 to 1855-11-20 ownership Johannes Hendrik Venter quitrent · grant · confidence high
1851 residence Frederik Hendrik Swanepoel (b6c5d7e3) (1827-04-16–1909-09-08) farming
1855-11-20 to 1857-03-10 ownership Johannes Hendrik Mostert, Jan Adriaan Venter (1823-12-08–1898-11-23) freehold · transfer · confidence high
1857-03-10 boundary subdivision: becomes Venterskraal (Wolwekraal portion)
undated boundary subdivision: becomes Leeuw Rivier (Venterskraal resurvey)

What the record holds, in order

31 March 1937 boundary change resurvey: from Venterskraal (Wolwekraal portion)
31 March 1937 ownership owner not named in the record
freehold · resurvey · confidence high
undated boundary change subdivision: from Wolwekraal No. 17

Research notes

[SRC-072] The remaining 3,089 mg 470 sq rds of Venterskraal, resurveyed and re-registered as Leeuw Rivier in March 1937 (transport 3093) at 3,087.0061 morgen.

The research behind this page, kept separate from it: dated working notes, open questions, and what is not yet settled.

What the record is missing

A tenure with no one in it second order · B7 no-owner
OWN-000050 records a resurvey on Leeuw Rivier (Venterskraal resurvey) from 1937-03-31 and names no party. Either the holder was never read off the document, or the publishing rule withheld them, the page cannot tell you which, and neither can this.

What would settle it Re-read DOC-0056.

Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand, each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data. The whole set is on the questions page.