Part of Spreeuw Fontein & Toornits Kraal (Spreeufontein No. 26)
Lot A (Spreeufontein No. 26 Ptn 3)
· on record 1909 · show on the map
The farm's own history, the grant, the original survey, sits on that page.
- Farm number
- No. 26
- Portion
- 3
- District
- Prince Albert
- Extent, as the diagram states it
- 6103 morgen 122 sq roods
- Modern surveyed area
- 5227.1 ha
The historic extent and the modern surveyed area are two separate measurements and are not presented here as confirming each other. The first is what a surveyor wrote on a diagram, usually in morgen. The second is what the modern cadastre draws.
Why this farm is here
A piece of a farm already in this model. 56 km from Klaarstroom.
- parcel Cut out of Spreeuw Fontein & Toornits Kraal (Spreeufontein No. 26)
- parcel Cut out of Vredendal (Spreeufontein No. 26 Ptn 1)
- lead An open question in this record is about this ground People on this site linked to nothing
- lead An open question in this record is about this ground Six parcels whose surveyed extent is far from their polygon with no reason recorded
Before this ground was cut out
This is the history of Vredendal (Spreeufontein No. 26 Ptn 1), the farm this ground was part of until 1909. It is shown here because this ground was that farm, and separately from what follows because before the cut the record says the farm's name and not which part of it. Not everything below necessarily happened on this piece.
- 1834 document SG diagram 432/1834 Bf.W.Q.5-26
- 1841-04-15 to 1848-07-21 ownership Cornelis Floris Johannes Meyer (1791-07-15–1848-07-21) Perpetual Quitrent · grant · confidence high
- 1850 boundary subdivision: from Spreeuw Fontein & Toornits Kraal (Spreeufontein No. 26)
- 1850 boundary subdivision: becomes Vredendal (Spreeufontein No. 26 Ptn 1)
- 1871~ to 1874-06-30 ownership Lodewyk Bothma (1802-05-24–1874-06-30) owner · confidence high
- 1872 boundary subdivision: becomes Spreeufontein No. 26 Ptn 2
- ../1874-06-30 residence Lodewyk Bothma (1802-05-24–1874-06-30) death notice
- 1884 residence Frans Stephanus Botma (1860-1936) (1860-02–1936-04-04) register
- 1886-07-24 grave Engela Susara Niehaus, born Botes Botma burial ground, Vredendal / Gatsplaas (Spreeufontein Ptn 1), Hier rust het lijk van ENGELA SUSARA NIEHAUS geb BOTES, overleden op den 24 July 1886. Met den ouderdom van 49 jaar 2 maanden en 22 dagen. Then Revelation 14:13: 'Zalig zyn de dooden die in de Heer sterven van nu aan, ja zegt de gees, opdat zy rusten mogen van hunne arbeid, en hunne werken volgen met hen. Openb. 14:13.' Cut in a fine cursive hand across the whole slab.
- 1891-08-20 document newspaper
- 1894-04 document SG diagram 3762/1898 (pt 1) P.T.A.Q.5-12
- 1894-04 document SG diagram 3762/1898 (pt 2) P.T.A.Q.5-12
- 1903 boundary remainder: becomes Klein Waterval (Spreeufontein No. 26 Remainder)
- 1909 boundary subdivision: becomes Lot A (Spreeufontein No. 26 Ptn 3)
- 1909 boundary subdivision: becomes Lot B (Spreeufontein No. 26 Ptn 4)
- 1909 boundary subdivision: becomes Lot C (Spreeufontein No. 26 Ptn 5)
- 19XX boundary subdivision: from Spreeuw Fontein & Toornits Kraal (Spreeufontein No. 26)
- 19XX boundary subdivision: becomes Vredendal (Spreeufontein No. 26 Ptn 1)
- undated boundary subdivision: becomes Lot A (Spreeufontein No. 26 Ptn 3)
- undated boundary subdivision: becomes Lot B (Spreeufontein No. 26 Ptn 4)
- undated boundary subdivision: becomes Lot C (Spreeufontein No. 26 Ptn 5)
- undated document SG diagram verso 3762/1898 (verso)
- undated document SG diagram verso 432/1834 (verso)
- undated grave Gertruida Johanna Swanepoel Botma burial ground, Vredendal / Gatsplaas (Spreeufontein Ptn 1), Not seen by this project. eGGSA caption: 'SWANEPOEL Gertruida Johanna 1915-'. The dash with no closing year means the photographer read a birth year and no death year, or the death year was illegible.
What the record holds, in order
- 1909 boundary change subdivision: from Vredendal (Spreeufontein No. 26 Ptn 1)
- undated boundary change subdivision: from Spreeuw Fontein & Toornits Kraal (Spreeufontein No. 26)
Also bordered by, as the modern cadastre draws it
Ground that touches this farm on the Surveyor-General's current polygons and that none of the diagrams held here names. Derived from the geometry, not read off a document.
- NE Lammers Kraal No. 11
- E Spreeuw Fontein & Toornits Kraal (Spreeufontein No. 26)
- E Lot B (Spreeufontein No. 26 Ptn 4)
- E Lot C (Spreeufontein No. 26 Ptn 5)
- S Bokfontein No. 94 (formerly Waterfall)
- W Varsche Fontein
- W Welbedacht (Varsche Fontein No. 27 Ptn 4)
- W Varsche Fontein No. 27 Remainder
Cadastre
Surveyor-General diagram index for this parcel
Surveyor-General diagram index for the whole farm, where the original survey of this ground sits.
Research notes
cut from Portion 1 in 1909; deed 1909-83-5218
[13 Aug 2026] Renamed to the one form this model uses for every portion - the portion's own name, then the parent farm, its number and the portion in brackets - so that a name is legible in a list, a search result and a map popup without the reader having to know which farm number is which. It read "Spreeufontein Portion 3 (Lot A)" before. Nothing about the ground changed.
[17 Sep 2026, LEAD-0008] RE-PINNED from RE/3/26 (key ...031, 3,224.6 ha) to 3/26 (key ...030, 5,230.5 ha). Lot A as surveyed is 6,103 morgen 122 sq roods, about 5,227 ha, and 3/26 agrees within 0.1%; RE/3/26 is what was left after Portion 7 (7/26, 2,005.9 ha) was cut from it later, and 3,224.6 + 2,005.9 = 5,230.5. The portion number was the Surveyor-General's all along; the pin had caught the later remainder.
The research behind this page, kept separate from it: dated working notes, open questions, and what is not yet settled.
Open questions
-
People on this site linked to nothing
priority 1 · LEAD-0074
Which parcels and people exist on the site as dead ends - reachable by a list, but linked to no document, story, owner or neighbour?
What would settle it For the 106 tree-derived rows, a parentage pass merged from the family-tree on tree id - which 6 already names as the direction of travel and which would connect them wholesale rather than one at a time. For the three floating names, find the document each came from and link it.
-
Our portion numbers do not match the SG on Vrolykheid and Spreeufontein
priority 2 · LEAD-0008
Do our portion numbers for Vrolykheid and Spreeufontein correspond to the Surveyor-General portion numbers, or are they our own sequence?
What would settle it The portion number printed on each diagram, against the SG portion number in the cadastre.
-
Six parcels whose surveyed extent is far from their polygon with no reason recorded
priority 2 · LEAD-0093
For each, is the extent mistyped, or did ground leave the farm without a note?
What would settle it The deduction table. It lists portion, name, extent, diagram and deed on one line.
What the record is missing
-
Nobody is on record as ever having held this
third order · B8 never-held
Lot A (Spreeufontein No. 26 Ptn 3) is in the model and drawn on the map, and carries no ownership record of any kind, not a grant, not a transfer, not an occupation.
What would settle it The Surveyor-General's diagram for the farm number names the grantee and the date; the deed reference on it opens the transfer chain.
Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand,
each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data.
The whole set is on the
questions page.