Elisabeth Rebecca van Bengalen
omstreeks 1700 – 3 Julie 1759 · van Bengale line
Naam
- Voorname
- Elisabeth Rebecca
- Van
- van Bengalen
Die formele doopnaam en die naam waarop iemand werklik geroep is, word albei gehou, en nie een word van die ander afgelei nie. Spelling wat van rekord tot rekord verskil, is self getuienis en nie geraas nie.
Drie geslagte om hierdie mens
Werk uit hoe hierdie mens aan iemand anders verwant is →
Klik op enige naam, dan word dieselfde drie geslagte om daardie mens getrek. Daar is nie 'n stampaar hier nie, en ook nie 'n bopunt aan die boom nie: dit wys net die familie wat die naaste aan die mens staan oor wie jy lees, en 'n oop plek is 'n gaping in die rekord eerder as 'n uitspraak oor iemand.
Naaste familie
- Kinders
- Apollonia Jansz van de Caab
'n Lewe in die rekord
- omstreeks 1700 gebore Born
- 3 Julie 1759 oorlede Died
Stories
- mentioned 'n Vrou se ses-en-veertig besittings
Wat ons nie weet nie
- Nie een ouer is aangeteken nie, dus hang hierdie mens nie aan die boom bo hom of haar nie.
- Geen gedateerde rekord bind hierdie mens aan 'n bepaalde stuk grond nie.
A sourced gap beats an unsourced fill. These are the open questions on this person, stated rather than papered over.
Navorsingsnotas
A DIRECT ANCESTOR at nine generations - the closest of the three to the present - by way of the MOCKE line: Elisabeth Rebecca van BengalenH -> Apollonia Jansz van de CaabH -> Sophia Rebecca PlagmanM -> Frederik Simon MockeL -> Sophia Johanna MockeM -> and onward. Married to Carel Jansz van Bengal, so both parents of the next generation carry the toponym. NO PLACE IS ASSERTED HERE. The private tree gives a birthplace, but this project treats the tree's place strings as hostile and they are least reliable exactly where they matter most - on people carried across an ocean. The toponym in the NAME is what the Cape record itself used and is recorded as written. VERIFICATION ROUTE: the First Fifty Years project, which transcribes the Cape records of 1652 onward and documents enslaved and free-black people rather than only settlers. Nothing here should be repeated as established until it is checked against a transcribed record. [TREE] [TO VERIFY]
[15 Aug 2026, FS] FamilySearch id filled from the FamilySearch id field of the family tree exports, matched on this row's own tree id and accepted only because the tree's NAME AND YEARS agree with this row. It is a door to the sources, not a source: nothing here is taken from the profile.
[22 Sep 2026, SRC-664] NOT IN THE FIRST FIFTY YEARS index, under this name or her family's. The index has an 'Anna Rebekka van Bengalen' as a baptism witness in 1732, which may be worth testing [TO VERIFY].
These are working notes, not finished prose: they carry the reasoning, the corrections and the things still marked to verify. They are kept here so the page itself can read as what is known.
Die werksnotas op hierdie werf word in Engels gehou en word nie vertaal nie. Hulle verander met elke navorsingsessie, en 'n vertaling sou uit pas raak met die oorspronklike. Alles anders - die stories, die getranskribeerde dokumente en die koppelvlak - is in Afrikaans.
Oop vrae
-
FamilySearch ids for the enslaved and free-black ancestors, and for Anthony van de Kaap
prioriteit 1 · LEAD-0112
Eleven people at the head of this family — the ten of S021 plus Catharina van PalliacattaM — and the one enslaved man in the family's own estate papers carry no FamilySearch id between them. Which of them have profiles, and what are the ids?
Wat dit sou uitmaak An id per person, or a recorded finding that no profile exists.
-
Import the nine Cape descent chains - they are Frans's own ancestry, generation 9 to 13
prioriteit 1 · LEAD-0116
Eight of S021's ten have no recorded child in this model, so the site names a descent it cannot walk. The private tree holds every chain. Importing them means about fifty new person rows across the de Wet, Mocke, Duminy, Snyman, van Dyk, Janse van Vuuren, Smuts and du Preez lines. Is that in scope?
Wat dit sou uitmaak Frans deciding. A middle course exists: import only the chains that reach families the site actually writes about, and leave the rest as a stated gap on the page.
Elders
FamilySearch-profiel MJYS-CLL