Voorbaat Nr. 42 (Ladismith)

42 op die kadaster · op rekord 1832 · wys op die kaart

Plaasnommer: Nr. 42
Ook aangeteken as: Voorbaat; De Vorbaat; de Voorbaat
Op die kadaster: 42, heel plaasgeregistreer as VOORBAAT
Grootte, soos die kaart dit stel: 1740 morgen 50 square roods (SG 482/1832)
Moderne opgemete oppervlakte: 1460.7 ha

Die historiese grootte en die moderne opgemete oppervlakte is twee aparte metings en word hier nie aangebied asof hulle mekaar bevestig nie. Die eerste is wat 'n landmeter op 'n kaart geskryf het, gewoonlik in morg. Die tweede is wat die moderne kadaster teken.

Waarom hierdie plaas hier is

Hier omdat 'n oop vraag in hierdie rekord daaroor gaan; wie hierdie grond gehou het, is nog nie vasgestel nie. 136 km van Klaarstroom.

dokument 'n Dokument in die versameling beskryf hierdie grond DOC-0328
begrafnis 'n Begraafplaas staan op hierdie plaas Voorbaat district Ladismith in the Cape (Ladismith-distrik)
leidraad 'n Oop vraag in hierdie rekord gaan oor hierdie grond Put a ruler across the 1805 opening: whose farm is Modderfontyn?
leidraad 'n Oop vraag in hierdie rekord gaan oor hierdie grond Are the Stassens of Voorbaat descended from the 1814 Oosthuizen marriage?
…en nog 1, volledig gelys verder af op hierdie bladsy.

Wat die rekord hou, in volgorde

1832 document SG diagram 482/1832

Op hierdie grond begrawe

Voorbaat district Ladismith in the Cape (Ladismith-distrik) 0 grafte opgeteken

Die begrafnisse verskyn ook op hierdie plaas se tydlyn hierbo, elkeen op sy eie datum.

Ook begrens deur, soos die moderne kadaster dit teken

Grond wat aan hierdie plaas raak op die Landmeter-generaal se huidige poligone en wat geen kaart wat hier gehou word, noem nie. Afgelei uit die meetkunde, nie van 'n dokument afgelees nie.

W Buffelsfontein Nr. 36 (Ladismith)

Dokumente

Skandering van Landmeter-generaal-kaart, 482/1832, 1832

Landmeter-generaal-kaart, 482/1832, 1832
10427522.jpg

Kadaster

Die Landmeter-generaal se kaartindeks vir hierdie perseel

Navorsingsnotas

*** SG DIAGRAM 482/1832 (DOC-0328, SRC-505) NOW NAMES IT OUTRIGHT: 'the loanplace called DE VORBAAT GELEEGEN AAN GROOT REVIER in extent 1740 Morgen and 50 Sqr. Roods Situated in the SWELLENDAM DISTRICT FIELDCORNETCY OF GROOTE SWARTEBERG'. *** Surveyed by H. F. Schutte. Extent agrees with the modern polygon: 1740 morgen is about 1,491 ha against the cadastre's 1,459.7. Cancelled 17 Oct 1967, superseded by Dgm B.536/1872.

CONTIGUOUS TO BUFFELSFONTEIN NO. 36 (PAR-000293), which its own diagram 483/1832 confirms from the other side. Other named neighbours: Deverlaate Miskraal van Willem Goosen, Baviaan Krans, Buffelsdrift, Dwars Revier, Boureboone-Fonteyn.

*** AND THE GROOT RIVER ANSWERS A QUESTION FROM 19 AUGUST. *** Reading the 1808 roll The Groot River is named twice on this sheet and runs through this farm; Ockertskraal lies 20 km south-west on the Touw.

NAMED IN THE FARM COLUMN OF THE 1805 SWELLENDAM OPGAAFROL - SRC-497, image 42, reads '1. Voorbaat' on the same opening that carries the Oosthuizen entries. WHICH HOUSEHOLD HELD IT IS STILL NOT ESTABLISHED. LEAD-0246.

THE BURIAL GROUND ON IT IS CEM-520, thirty-nine named graves, more than half of them STASSEN - and the private tree holds exactly one Oosthuizen-Stassen marriage in 44,143 people: Frans Johannes Nicolaas Stassen and PETRONELLA HERMINA JACOBA HENDRIKA OOSTHUIZEN (1793-1873), about 1814, she a granddaughter of Jacobus OosthuizenL (PER-000230) and Dina Carolina BritzM and a first cousin of Ockert Almero. LEAD-0255.

NOT CORE AND NOT IN THE KOUP: no plc_id, so scope.in_koup fails closed and the map's opening bounds stay on Klaarstroom. 9a - a prequel ground is drawn so the road can be seen, never grown into a second district.

Werknotas, hier gewys omdat dit 'n private navorsingsbou is.

Die werksnotas op hierdie werf word in Engels gehou en word nie vertaal nie. Hulle verander met elke navorsingsessie, en 'n vertaling sou uit pas raak met die oorspronklike. Alles anders - die stories, die getranskribeerde dokumente en die koppelvlak - is in Afrikaans.

Oop vrae

Put a ruler across the 1805 opening: whose farm is Modderfontyn? prioriteit 1 · LEAD-0246
Image 41 of film 008145384 carries Oosthuizen entries 776-790, among them 784 OCKERT with Susanna Catharina van TonderMen and 789 OCKT: ALMERO. The facing leaf, image 42, carries the farm column: de Wolve Fonteyn, aan d' Vals Rivier en d' Berg Rivier of Fo[ntein], de groote Heuvel en d' Buffels Fo[ntein], MODDERFONTYN, Voorbaat, Riet Valey. Which farm row reads across to which entry?

Wat dit sou uitmaak A ruled line traced from an entry number on the left leaf to a farm row on the right leaf. Nothing less. The two leaves currently held are screenshots at different zooms.
Are the Stassens of Voorbaat descended from the 1814 Oosthuizen marriage? prioriteit 1 · LEAD-0255
Voorbaat cemetery, Ladismith (CEM-520), is more than half Stassen and repeats the name FRANS JOHANNES NICOLAAS STASSEN at 1852-1939, 1904-1984 and 1935-2000. The private tree holds one Oosthuizen-Stassen marriage: Frans Johannes Nicolaas Stassen, b. about 1789, and Petronella Hermina Jacoba Hendrika Oosthuizen, 1793-1873, about 1814. Do the Voorbaat Stassens come down from that couple?

Wat dit sou uitmaak One document linking the 1852 Stassen to the 1814 couple. The name recurrence alone cannot do it.
The Ladismith burial grounds repeat this family's marriages, not just its surname prioriteit 1 · LEAD-0256
[FAMILY] Any other cemetery in ladismith area with Oosthuizen, or first names combinations that repeat in Oosthuizen tree? Five Ladismith grounds carry Oosthuizen graves. Are these the same family, and which of the marriages the stones show are already in this record?

Wat dit sou uitmaak A death notice or baptism naming parents for any one of: Catherina Oosthuizen who married a Gerrit Johannes van Zyl; Michiel J. Oosthuizen 1881-1945; Catharina Hendrina Oosthuizen 1879-1957.

Wat die rekord kortkom

Nobody is on record as ever having held this third order · B8 never-held
Voorbaat Nr. 42 (Ladismith) is in the model and drawn on the map, and carries no ownership record of any kind, not a grant, not a transfer, not an occupation.

What would settle it The Surveyor-General's diagram for the farm number names the grantee and the date; the deed reference on it opens the transfer chain.

Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand, each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data. The whole set is on the questions page.