Rondabel Nr. 124 Gdlt 8

8/124 op die kadaster · op rekord 1947 · wys op die kaart

Die plaas se eie geskiedenis — die toekenning, die oorspronklike opmeting — sit op daardie bladsy.

Plaasnommer: Nr. 124
Gedeelte: 8
Op die kadaster: 8/124, gedeeltegeregistreer as RONDABLE
Distrik: Prince Albert
Grootte, soos die kaart dit stel: 160,2089 morge
Moderne opgemete oppervlakte: 139.5 ha

Die historiese grootte en die moderne opgemete oppervlakte is twee aparte metings en word hier nie aangebied asof hulle mekaar bevestig nie. Die eerste is wat 'n landmeter op 'n kaart geskryf het, gewoonlik in morg. Die tweede is wat die moderne kadaster teken.

Waarom hierdie plaas hier is

'n Stuk van 'n plaas wat reeds in hierdie model is. 15 km van Klaarstroom.

perseel Uitgesny uit Rondabel
dokument 'n Dokument in die versameling beskryf hierdie grond DOC-0188

Wat die rekord hou, in volgorde

September 1947 document SG diagram 9001/1947
S.G.T. 1444
undated boundary change subdivision: from Rondabel

Ook begrens deur, soos die moderne kadaster dit teken

Grond wat aan hierdie plaas raak op die Landmeter-generaal se huidige poligone en wat geen kaart wat hier gehou word, noem nie. Afgelei uit die meetkunde, nie van 'n dokument afgelees nie.

SE Rondabel
SE Visgat (Rondabel Nr. 124 Gdlt 2)
SW Rondabel Nr. 124 Restant
W Rhemhoogte Nr. 125
NW Rhemhoogte Nr. 125 Gdlt 8
NW Swartskraal (Rhemhoogte Nr. 125 Gdlt 6)

Dokumente

catalogued, no scan held

Landmeter-generaal-kaart, 9001/1947, September 1947
SCAN334 124 8.jpg

Kadaster

Die Landmeter-generaal se kaartindeks vir hierdie perseel

Die Landmeter-generaal se kaartindeks vir die hele plaas — waar die oorspronklike opmeting van hierdie grond lê.

Navorsingsnotas

[1 Aug 2026] IN THE MODEL FROM THE CADASTRE PULL ONLY. The Surveyor-General has a polygon for it and this project has no document that names it, so it carries geometry, an extent and a name and no history. It is here because RONDABEL IS A CORE FARM of this project and the map was showing the parent outline with four of its nine modern parcels named, which reads as an absence in the record and is not one. It was absent purely because nobody had made the row, not because anything was missing from the pull: data/geo/prince_albert_farm_portions.geojson has held this polygon all along and match_cadastre.py can only match parcels that exist. Cadastre: 167.2 ha, LPI C06100000000012400008. The model already holds Ptn 3 Brand Kraal (PAR-000042), Ptn 5 Hartebeest Voedpad (PAR-000043), Ptn 6 Elandsfontein (PAR-000044) and Ptn 7 Klein Elandsfontein (PAR-000045), each off its own diagram. This row has no diagram behind it and no name beyond the cadastre's. [TO VERIFY] what it was called and who held it, from the Rondabel deduction tables and the CSG diagram index.

[3 Aug 2026, SRC-222] 160,2089 morge, surveyed September 1947 by J.F.E. Hartwig as an Onderverdelingskaart under Art. 24(b) of Act 9 of 1927. The Traka River forms part of the boundary. Its sheet names Rondabel's ORIGINAL diagram, 502/1867, attached to title P.A.Q. 1-21.

[13 Aug 2026] Renamed to the one form this model uses for every portion - the portion's own name, then the parent farm, its number and the portion in brackets - so that a name is legible in a list, a search result and a map popup without the reader having to know which farm number is which. It read "Rondabel Portion 8 (No. 124 Ptn 8)" before. Nothing about the ground changed.

Werknotas, hier gewys omdat dit 'n private navorsingsbou is.

Die werksnotas op hierdie werf word in Engels gehou en word nie vertaal nie. Hulle verander met elke navorsingsessie, en 'n vertaling sou uit pas raak met die oorspronklike. Alles anders — die stories, die getranskribeerde dokumente en die koppelvlak — is in Afrikaans.

Wat die rekord kortkom

Nobody is on record as ever having held this third order · B8 never-held
Rondabel Nr. 124 Gdlt 8 is in the model and drawn on the map, and carries no ownership record of any kind, not a grant, not a transfer, not an occupation.

What would settle it The Surveyor-General's diagram for the farm number names the grantee and the date; the deed reference on it opens the transfer chain.

Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand, each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data. The whole set is on the questions page.