← The land

Source SRC-548

family-tree 'JG Du Plessis 1826 (family-tree)' - 860 individuals, exported from MacFamilyTree

compiled tree · a copy, index or transcription · consulted 2026-08-23

Type
compiled tree
Repository
Supplied by Frans Oosthuizen, dropped in the inbox; held privately, not published
Reference
family-tree 7.0.3, SOUR SyniumFamilyTree / MacFamilyTree 11.2.3. 860 individuals, 325 families.
Consulted
2026-08-23

The citation as it was given

Fetched to settle whether Jacobus Johannes Petrus du Plessis was Cecilia Maria's brother. IT DOES NOT CONTAIN THAT FAMILY, and the reason is recorded because the file looks as though it should. | ITS ONLY Johannes Gysbertus du Plessis is (FS L1HV-DXJ, since merged into LVT7-HF7): no birth date, no death date, no spouse, appearing solely as a CHILD of Daniel Jacobus du Plessis b. 3 Jan 1831 and Catharina Elizabeth Johanna Delport b. 1837. A father born 1831 cannot have a son born 1826, and that couple's earliest dated child is 1855. | OUR Johannes Gysbertus (1826-1913, KC34-PVM) is a son of Daniel Jacobus 1802-1879 and Susanna Johanna Catharina van der Westhuizen 1803-1852. NEITHER IS IN THE FILE. Its only van der Westhuizen died in 1698; it holds no Theron and no Jan Gysbert du Plessis of 1781. | *** AND IT CARRIES A CECILIA MARIA DU PLESSIS BORN 2 DECEMBER 1863 *** where ours is 9 January 1857 to 10 April 1895 - same name, same generation, wrong woman. That is the whole hazard of a name-matched id in one line. | Surname profile, for whoever meets this file again: Olivier 62, Oosthuizen 54, Klopper 52, Botha 50, van der Merwe 41, Delport 40 - and only 18 du Plessis. It is not a du Plessis tree. | The file itself is NOT published and its path is not recorded here: the leak gate refused the build over a family-tree path in this row, correctly - a private export has no business in a public payload. It is held in the project's own discard folder.

Kept verbatim. This project contradicts published genealogies and corrects a family's own oral tradition, so every claim has to be checkable by someone who was not in the room.

Nothing in the model cites this source yet.