Paarde Poort No. 80

Farm number: No. 80
District: Willowmore

This parcel has no matched survey polygon, so it cannot be drawn on the map. That is a gap in the cadastre match, not an absence from the record.

Why this farm is here

In the model from the cadastre pull only, nothing in the record yet says who held this ground or why it belongs here. Not yet placed on the map.

What the record holds, in order

No dated record on this parcel yet. It is on the map because the Surveyor-General has a polygon for it; the history is not transcribed.

Research notes

[SRC-550] Drawn on SG 1911/1862, the (Registration) Plan of a portion of the FIELD CORNETCY OF TRAKA, Division of Prince Albert, framed from actual survey 1862 and stamped ADMIN DISTRICT WILLOWMORE. The Traka field cornetcy is PLC-000022 and straddles the Prince Albert / Willowmore boundary; the registration division here is Willowmore (C0830000), NOT Prince Albert, and a farm number is only unique inside a division. NO FAMILY HOLDING IS RECORDED ON THIS GROUND - the parcel is entered because the plan documents it, not because anybody here held it. Extent as written on the plan: [?1364 M 110 SR] - read off a low-resolution scan and NOT confirmed; the cadastre area alongside is the reliable figure. NOT FOUND in the Willowmore cadastre pull: no polygon carries this farm number in registration division C0830000, so the row is deliberately unpinned. LEAD-0278.

The research behind this page, kept separate from it: dated working notes, open questions, and what is not yet settled.

What the record is missing

Nobody is on record as ever having held this third order · B8 never-held
Paarde Poort No. 80 is in the model, and carries no ownership record of any kind, not a grant, not a transfer, not an occupation.

What would settle it The Surveyor-General's diagram for the farm number names the grantee and the date; the deed reference on it opens the transfer chain.

Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand, each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data. The whole set is on the questions page.