Hendrik Johannes Oosthuizen
omstreeks 1840 – ? · Oosthuizen line
Descends from the root couple, 1 generation up
Name
- Baptismal name
- Hendrik Johannes
- Given
- Hendrik Johannes
- Surname
- Oosthuizen
The formal baptismal name and the name a person was actually called are both kept, and neither is derived from the other. Spelling drift between records is evidence, not noise.
Naaste familie
- Father
- Ockert Almero Oosthuizen
- Mother
- Adriana Cecilia Venter
- Brothers and sisters
-
- 1808Johanna Jacomina Oosthuizen
- 1811Susanna Catharina Oosthuizen (b.1811)
- 1813Ockert Jacobus Oosthuizen
- 1816Adriana Cecilia Oosthuizen (b.1816)
- 1816Johannes Adriaan Oosthuizen
- 1819Petrus Marthinus Oosthuizen
- 1820Gert Adriaan Oosthuizen
- 1823Jacobus Daniel Johannes Oosthuizen
- 1828Catharina Petronella Oosthuizen
- 1828Cornelis Andries Oosthuizen (b.1828)
- 1830Martha Jacoba Maria Magdalena Oosthuizen
- 1832Dina Magdalena Oosthuizen
- 1839Ockert Almero Oosthuizen (b.1839)
'n Lewe in die rekord
- omstreeks 1840 gebore Born
Stories
- mentioned Twee-en-dertig jaar
Wat ons nie weet nie
- Geen sterfdatum is aangeteken nie.
- Geen gedateerde rekord bind hierdie mens aan 'n bepaalde stuk grond nie.
A sourced gap beats an unsourced fill. These are the open questions on this person, stated rather than papered over.
Navorsingsnotas
[SRC-073] Youngest child of the root couple. The tree names him Hendrik Johannes; Pottas has Johannes Hendrik [TO VERIFY]. Nothing further known - one of Pottas's three open questions from 2005, still open.
29 Jul 2026 FamilySearch G6GF-98B names him Johannes Hendrikus and dates his birth 1835, against Pottas c.1840 and the family-tree c.1841 [TO VERIFY].
29 Jul 2026 [SRC-077] SETTLED: the death notice names him HENDRIK JOHANNES, matching the family-tree. Pottas had the names reversed. Corrected.
These are working notes, not finished prose: they carry the reasoning, the corrections and the things still marked to verify. They are kept here so the page itself can read as what is known.
Die werksnotas op hierdie werf word in Engels gehou en word nie vertaal nie. Hulle verander met elke navorsingsessie, en 'n vertaling sou uit pas raak met die oorspronklike. Alles anders — die stories, die getranskribeerde dokumente en die koppelvlak — is in Afrikaans.
Oop vrae
-
Nine people carry a different FamilySearch id here and in the tree
prioriteit 2 · LEAD-0036
For nine people the model records one FamilySearch id and the family-tree's _FID records another. Which is the live profile, and are the two ids two profiles for one person that want merging on FamilySearch itself?
Wat dit sou uitmaak Loading each id and seeing whether it redirects.
-
Seven people carry a hand-entered FamilySearch id that the family-tree disagrees with
prioriteit 3 · LEAD-0019
Backfilling familysearch_id from the family-tree's _FID tag agreed with the hand-entered value on 103 of 110 people and disagreed on 7. Which id is current for each - or do both resolve to the same person after a merge?
Wat dit sou uitmaak A redirect proves a merge and the survivor id is the one to keep. Two live, distinct profiles means one of them is the wrong person, and the vitals decide which.
Elders
FamilySearch-profiel G6GF-98B