Deel van Cyferfontein Nr. 115
Paardefontein (Cyferfontein Nr. 115 Gdlt 2)
2/115 op die kadaster · op rekord 1916 · wys op die kaart
Die plaas se eie geskiedenis — die toekenning, die oorspronklike opmeting — sit op daardie bladsy.
- Plaasnommer
- Nr. 115
- Gedeelte
- 2
- Op die kadaster
- 2/115, gedeeltegeregistreer as CYFERFONTEIN
- Distrik
- Prince Albert
- Grootte, soos die kaart dit stel
- 3286 morgen 200 square roods
- Moderne opgemete oppervlakte
- 2708.9 ha
Die historiese grootte en die moderne opgemete oppervlakte is twee aparte metings en word hier nie aangebied asof hulle mekaar bevestig nie. Die eerste is wat 'n landmeter op 'n kaart geskryf het, gewoonlik in morg. Die tweede is wat die moderne kadaster teken.
Waarom hierdie plaas hier is
'n Stuk van 'n plaas wat reeds in hierdie model is. 38 km van Klaarstroom.
- perseel Uitgesny uit Cyferfontein Nr. 115
- grens Deel 'n grens met Klipgat Nr. 114 Klipgat Nr. 114
- grens Deel 'n grens met Cyferfontein Nr. 115 Cyferfontein Nr. 115
- dokument 'n Dokument in die versameling beskryf hierdie grond DOC-0213
Wat die rekord hou, in volgorde
- Augustus 1916 document SG diagram 1640/1916
- undated boundary change subdivision: from Cyferfontein Nr. 115
Begrens deur, soos die kaart hulle noem
- NW Wolve Kraal
- E, N & NE Cyferfontein Remainder (the middle of the Kouka River from X to Y)
- S Toornits Kraal
- S Lot No. 1 of Cyferfontein
- W Klipgat
Ook begrens deur, soos die moderne kadaster dit teken
Grond wat aan hierdie plaas raak op die Landmeter-generaal se huidige poligone en wat geen kaart wat hier gehou word, noem nie. Afgelei uit die meetkunde, nie van 'n dokument afgelees nie.
- N Wolwekraal Nr. 17
- NE Annex Boesmans Vlei Nr. 20
- SE Doorn Kraal Nr. 116
- SE Doorn Kraal Nr. 116 Gdlt 1
- SW Voelfontein Nr. 213
- W Bontwater (Klipgat Nr. 114 Gdlt 8)
Dokumente
Kadaster
Die Landmeter-generaal se kaartindeks vir hierdie perseel
Die Landmeter-generaal se kaartindeks vir die hele plaas — waar die oorspronklike opmeting van hierdie grond lê.
Navorsingsnotas
[3 Aug 2026, SRC-247] A NAMED PORTION - exactly what LEAD-0067 is about. The margin of the diagram reads "Portion 2 - Paardefontein (a portion of portion) of the farm Cyferfontein No. 115, PRINCE ALBERT", and the body: 3286 morgen 200 square roods in the Division of Prince Albert, FIELD CORNETCY OF TRAKA No. 3, "being Paardefontein, part of the Farm Cyferfontein granted to J.L. Strydom on the 15th April 1841". Surveyed and beaconed August 1916 by A.J. de VilliersM, Government Land Surveyor; deducted No. 2440, 19 October 1916. BOUNDED: NW by Wolve Kraal; E, N and NE by the Remainder, and from X to Y THE MIDDLE OF THE KOUKA RIVER IS THE BOUNDARY; S by Toornits Kraal and Lot No. 1 of Cyferfontein; W by Klipgat. THE TRANSFER, 22 May 1917, is stamped on the sheet: in favour of "M.E.C. Venter, born Swanepoel, married out of community to W.A. Venter" - a Venter and a Swanepoel, two of this project's families, holding ground between Klipgat and the Kouka. IDENTITY NOT ASSERTED, because 9 forbids matching on a name alone and this is initials. The model holds TWO women called Maria Elizabeth Catharina SwanepoelL alive in 1917 (PER-000581, b. 1888; PER-000711, b. 1884), and a Willem Adriaan VenterM (PER-000107) whose recorded floruit is 1879-1897, twenty years earlier. Plausible on all three counts and proved on none. LEAD-0070. No cadastral polygon: the extract holds only the parent 115 (7 346,5 ha), no portions. This portion is 3 286 1/3 morgen, about 2 815 ha, roughly 38% of the parent. [TO VERIFY]
[4 Aug 2026] plc_id was blank, so match_cadastre.py skipped this row entirely - it matches only within a registration division and a blank plc_id yields no division. Set to PLC-000001, Prince Albert.
*** [4 Aug 2026] sg_farm_key WAS 'NO-POLYGON' AND THAT WAS FALSE. *** The sentinel asserts that this ground has no cadastral counterpart, which is what 5 reserves it for - a vernacular name like Drooge Kloof that no diagram ever carried. This parcel is not that: the Surveyor-General publishes its polygon under the exact key its own farm and portion number imply, and it was sitting in geo/prince_albert_*.geojson the whole time. The sentinel is cleared so match_cadastre.py can do its job. Reasoning from absence, stated as fact - the same mistake as Drooge Kloof and Modderdrift, both recorded in 5a.
Werknotas, hier gewys omdat dit 'n private navorsingsbou is.
Die werksnotas op hierdie werf word in Engels gehou en word nie vertaal nie. Hulle verander met elke navorsingsessie, en 'n vertaling sou uit pas raak met die oorspronklike. Alles anders — die stories, die getranskribeerde dokumente en die koppelvlak — is in Afrikaans.
Oop vrae
-
Who are the M.E.C. Venter born Swanepoel and the W.A. Venter who took Paardefontein in 1917?
prioriteit 2 · LEAD-0070
Which Maria Elizabeth Catharina SwanepoelL married which Willem Adriaan VenterM, and are they the pair named on the 1917 transfer of Paardefontein?
Wat dit sou uitmaak Full given names on the transfer deed, or a marriage naming a Willem Adriaan VenterM and a Maria Elizabeth Catharina SwanepoelL.
Wat die rekord kortkom
-
“Wolve Kraal” is named as a neighbour 2 times and we hold no parcel for it
third order · B3 unheld-farm
2 separate surveys in this model put Wolve Kraal on the boundary of ground we do hold (PAR-000153, PAR-000182). It has no parcel of its own here, so nothing is known about who held it or when, while it borders farms at the centre of the project.
What would settle it The Surveyor-General's farm index for the registration division will give it a farm number and a diagram; the cadastre pull in `data/fetch_cadastre.py` then places it on the map.
-
Nobody is on record as ever having held this
third order · B8 never-held
Paardefontein (Cyferfontein Nr. 115 Gdlt 2) is in the model and drawn on the map, and carries no ownership record of any kind, not a grant, not a transfer, not an occupation.
What would settle it The Surveyor-General's diagram for the farm number names the grantee and the date; the deed reference on it opens the transfer chain.
Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand,
each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data.
The whole set is on the
questions page.