Graaff-Reinet baptism register, 13 January 1793 - Johanna Magtelt Peternella, daughter of Daniel Jacobus Strydom and Anna Magdalena Carelse
baptism register · 'n oorspronklike rekord · geraadpleeg 2026-08-23
- Soort
- baptism register
- Bewaarplek
- FamilySearch, "South Africa, Dutch Reformed Church Registers (Cape Town Archives), 1660-1994"
- Verwysing
- ark:/61903/1:1:6VT9-D6CV (index entry). Volume, from the filming target card supplied 23 Aug 2026: GRAAFF-REINET G6/3/1, baptisms 1792-1805, roll 106, project S-AF 00532. The entry stands on bladz 9 under the heading "Den 13 Januarij" 1793. FamilySearch film # 008121018; the bladz 6-7 opening is image 12 of 776.
- Geraadpleeg
- 2026-08-23
Die sitasie soos dit gegee is
Supplied by , as the FamilySearch source card AND the register image - so the reading and the citation are both here, which 5a-ii says are two separate claims. | THE ENTRY, as read from the image: "'t kind JOHANNA MAGTELT PETERNELLA / ouders / DANIEL JACOBUS STRYDOM / ANNA MAGDALENA CARELSE / getuygen / Johannes Nel / PETERNELLA CARELSE / Jan Hendrik Commering / Maria Elisabet [?Schoepers]". The last witness's surname is not confidently read and is marked. | *** WHAT IT SETTLES: HER NAME. *** PER-000138's doopnaam has stood as JOHANNA MACHTELD PETRONELLA and the register at her own baptism agrees. LEAD-0282 asked whether the woman written ANNA MAGDALENA Petronella Strydom as a witness at Stellenbosch in 1812 (SRC-545) and aan onder Traca in 1818 (SRC-454) was this woman or another; she is this woman, and the cause of the slip is now visible - HER OWN ELDER SISTER IS ANNA MAGDALENA STRYDOM (PER-000209), and at the 1818 baptism that sister is THE MOTHER OF THE CHILD, named two lines above the witnesses. A clerk carrying a name down one entry is the ordinary explanation and it is now the documented one. | *** WHAT IT PUTS IN QUESTION: HER MOTHER'S SURNAME. *** This register says the mother is ANNA MAGDALENA CARELSE, and FamilySearch's index of the same entry says Carelse too. THIS MODEL SAYS ANNA MAGDALENA CALITZ (PER-000338, 1771-1836, FS LZP9-TX6), on a [TREE] link at medium confidence. Calitz and Carelse are not variants of one another. The register carries CARELSE TWICE on this one entry - as the mother and as the witness PETERNELLA CARELSE - which is what a mother's own kin standing at a grandchild's font looks like, and it is hard to read as a slip. NOT OVERWRITTEN: this is not a spelling correction but a question of WHICH WOMAN, and PER-000338 carries her own FS id and dates. LEAD-0283. | *** AND A DATE TENSION, FLAGGED NOT FIXED. *** The model gives her birth as 1792-01-05 from the tree. This register baptises her on 13 JANUARY 1793. Infants on these same pages are baptised days after birth, so a birth of 5 January 1793 would fit the register exactly and the tree's year would be one out - but THE RECORD GIVES NO BIRTH DATE, only the baptism, so nothing is asserted. LEAD-0283. | [23 Aug 2026, LATER THE SAME DAY] THE PROVENANCE IS NO LONGER PARTLY INFERRED. BAPTISM, YEAR 1792-1805. 5a-ii - a reading and a citation are two claims, and this is the second one arriving after the first.
Woordeliks gehou. Hierdie projek weerspreek gepubliseerde genealogieë en stel 'n familie se eie mondelinge oorlewering reg, so elke bewering moet nagegaan kan word deur iemand wat nie in die vertrek was nie.
Wat uit hierdie bron oorgeskryf is
3 geleenthede.
-
13 Januarie 1793 · baptism · Graaff-Reinet
getuies: Johannes Nel, Jan Hendrik Commering -
13 Januarie 1793 · baptism · Graaff-Reinet
getuies: Peternella Carelse
SHE CARRIES THE MOTHER'S SURNAME AS THE REGISTER WRITES IT, and the child's thir -
13 Januarie 1793 · baptism · Graaff-Reinet
getuies: Maria Elisabet [?Schoepers]
Surname not confidently read on the scan and deliberately not guessed.
Niks in die model haal hierdie bron nog aan nie.