Francois Johannes van der Merwe

active 1885 · van der Merwe line

Name

Given: Francois Johannes
Surname: van der Merwe

The formal baptismal name and the name a person was actually called are both kept, and neither is derived from the other. Spelling drift between records is evidence, not noise.

'n Lewe in die rekord

27 Augustus 1885 grond Held it, Tyger Hoek Extension Nr. 688

Grond waarop hulle op rekord is

Tyger Hoek Extension Nr. 688 held it · 27 Augustus 1885

Stories

mentioned Die van der Merwes van die Hantam

Wat ons nie weet nie

Geen geboortedatum is aangeteken nie.
Geen sterfdatum is aangeteken nie.
Nie een ouer is aangeteken nie, dus hang hierdie mens nie aan die boom bo hom of haar nie.

A sourced gap beats an unsourced fill. These are the open questions on this person, stated rather than papered over.

Navorsingsnotas

[10 Aug 2026, SRC-360] HOLDS TITLE TO TYGER HOEK EXTENSION No. 688, quitrent issued 27 August 1885. Added under the 6 amendment that extends the profile boundary to people related to the land, whether or not they sit in the tree. HIS PLACE IN THE LINE IS NOT ESTABLISHED and is not guessed. He is not otherwise in this model; the surname and the ground are suggestive and 9 forbids matching on a name alone. The van der Merwes were on Tygerhoek from at least 1808, which makes a connection likely rather than proven. [TO VERIFY] flourished_edtf is the date of his title and is the only date claimed for him.

These are working notes, not finished prose: they carry the reasoning, the corrections and the things still marked to verify. They are kept here so the page itself can read as what is known.

Die werksnotas op hierdie werf word in Engels gehou en word nie vertaal nie. Hulle verander met elke navorsingsessie, en 'n vertaling sou uit pas raak met die oorspronklike. Alles anders — die stories, die getranskribeerde dokumente en die koppelvlak — is in Afrikaans.

Wat die rekord kortkom

The record stops in 1885 and never resumes second order · B2 trail-ends
Tyger Hoek Extension Nr. 688 was worked as far as 1885-08-27, with Francois Johannes van der MerweH the last owner on record. 141 years follow with nothing. Who held it after that, and is it still one farm?

What would settle it The current title deed traced backwards, each transfer names the one before it, or the Surveyor-General's subdivision diagrams, which are what usually explain a farm going quiet.

Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand, each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data. The whole set is on the questions page.