Elsje Dorothea Gouws (1775-1833)
1775 – 1833 · Botes line
Naam
- Voorname
- Elsje Dorothea
- Van
- Gouws
Die formele doopnaam en die naam waarop iemand werklik geroep is, word albei gehou, en nie een word van die ander afgelei nie. Spelling wat van rekord tot rekord verskil, is self getuienis en nie geraas nie.
Drie geslagte om hierdie mens
Werk uit hoe hierdie mens aan iemand anders verwant is →
Klik op enige naam, dan word dieselfde drie geslagte om daardie mens getrek. Daar is nie 'n stampaar hier nie, en ook nie 'n bopunt aan die boom nie: dit wys net die familie wat die naaste aan die mens staan oor wie jy lees, en 'n oop plek is 'n gaping in die rekord eerder as 'n uitspraak oor iemand.
Naaste familie
- Kinders
-
- 1792Catharina Botes (1792-1827)
- 1793Jacobus Abraham Botes (b.1793)
- 1794Engela Susanna Botes (b.1794)
- 1797Andries Stephanus Botes (1797-1872)
- 1797~Magdalena Frederica Botes
- 1801Elsje Dorothea Botes (1801-1841)
- 1802Anthonie Johannes Lourens Botes (1802-1874)
- 1805Anna Johanna Maria Botes (1805-1878)
- 1807Petrus Johannes Botes
- 1808Aletta Catharina Johanna Jacoba Botes (1808-1847)
- 1809Johanna Petronella Botes (b.1809)
- 1811Abraham Adriaan Botes (1811-1892)
- 1812Hester Botes (1812-1884)
- 1816Sybrand Lourens Botes (1816-1877)
'n Lewe in die rekord
- 1775 gebore Born
- 1833 oorlede Died
Wat ons nie weet nie
- Nie een ouer is aangeteken nie, dus hang hierdie mens nie aan die boom bo hom of haar nie.
- Geen gedateerde rekord bind hierdie mens aan 'n bepaalde stuk grond nie.
A sourced gap beats an unsourced fill. These are the open questions on this person, stated rather than papered over.
Navorsingsnotas
A child of Jacobus Abraham BotesL [LB6D-WKC] and Elsje Dorothea GouwsH [LC3S-HTS], fifteen children in all. Brought in because their daughter Magdalena Frederica married into the Storms of this district. Per 9a the Botes are a tool for stitching stones on this ground, not a family to follow outward. [FS] His wife, and a GOUWS - the surname on 39 unidentified stones in this project, more than any other after Botes. Her daughter Elsje Dorothea BotesH carries her names.
[14 Aug 2026] MERGED PER-001534 into this row. The wife of the pair merged immediately above, and duplicated for the same reason: PER-001534 came off the 1884 death notice as a name with no dates, PER-001579 from FamilySearch [LC3S-HTS] as Elsje Dorothea GouwsH 1775-1833 with the same husband and children. Merging the husbands and leaving the wives apart would have left the household half joined. Moved across: line=Botes. DISAGREEMENTS, kept rather than resolved - the FamilySearch id settles these in one click: display_name: kept 'Elsje Dorothea GouwsH (1775-1833)', PER-001534 said 'Elsje Dorothea GouwsH'.
These are working notes, not finished prose: they carry the reasoning, the corrections and the things still marked to verify. They are kept here so the page itself can read as what is known.
Die werksnotas op hierdie werf word in Engels gehou en word nie vertaal nie. Hulle verander met elke navorsingsessie, en 'n vertaling sou uit pas raak met die oorspronklike. Alles anders - die stories, die getranskribeerde dokumente en die koppelvlak - is in Afrikaans.
Oop vrae
-
The Botes hold no ground here - are they a district family this project can write about at all?
prioriteit 2 · LEAD-0194
The Botes turn up constantly in these records and hold NOTHING. Zero ownership rows, zero residences, no grant, no diagram, no farm. What the model does hold is 255 eGGSA captions naming Botes, 78 curated Botes gravestones, 50 stones in the Prince Albert NG Kerk cemetery alone, and a striking run of marriages into this district: Storm twice in two generations, two Botes brothers marrying two Niehaus sisters four months apart in 1880, plus Kruger, Combrink, Theron, Swanepoel and Oosthuizen. So: were the Botes ever ON this ground as occupiers, or are they a Beaufort West and Prince Albert town family that this district married?
Wat dit sou uitmaak One Botes name on a deed, a valuation roll or an opgaafrol for ground in this district - or a documented absence across those three, which would settle it the other way.
Elders
FamilySearch-profiel LC3S-HTS