Claesje van Angola

omstreeks 1645 – voor 1732-12-31

Drie geslagte om hierdie mens

Claesje van Angola 1645

Werk uit hoe hierdie mens aan iemand anders verwant is →

Klik op enige naam, dan word dieselfde drie geslagte om daardie mens getrek. Daar is nie 'n stampaar hier nie, en ook nie 'n bopunt aan die boom nie: dit wys net die familie wat die naaste aan die mens staan oor wie jy lees, en 'n oop plek is 'n gaping in die rekord eerder as 'n uitspraak oor iemand.

Naaste familie

Kinders: Jannetje van Wijk

'n Lewe in die rekord

voor 1732-12-31 oorlede Died
omstreeks 1645 gebore Born

Stories

mentioned 'n Vrou se ses-en-veertig besittings

Wat ons nie weet nie

Nie een ouer is aangeteken nie, dus hang hierdie mens nie aan die boom bo hom of haar nie.
Geen gedateerde rekord bind hierdie mens aan 'n bepaalde stuk grond nie.

A sourced gap beats an unsourced fill. These are the open questions on this person, stated rather than papered over.

Navorsingsnotas

[TREE] Added 6 Aug 2026. Named on [S021] as one of the enslaved or free-black people at the head of this family, and held no row in this model until now — the site asserted the descent on a published page while the model could not answer a single question about the person. Dates as the private tree gives them; NO PLACE IMPORTED, per 5. No FamilySearch id yet: see PEOPLE-WITHOUT-FS-ID.md and LEAD-0112. S021 is itself marked provisional — this descent rests on a family tree and not yet on the Cape records — and creating the row does not change that. [TO VERIFY] S021 gives 'before 31 Dec 1732', which is EDTF ../1732-12-31.

[15 Aug 2026, FS] FamilySearch id filled from the FamilySearch id field of the family tree exports, matched on this row's own tree id and accepted only because the tree's NAME AND YEARS agree with this row. It is a door to the sources, not a source: nothing here is taken from the profile.

[22 Sep 2026, SRC-664] FIRST FIFTY YEARS g8/p8113.htm (Wayback snapshot 20241213184045): one of the Angolans taken from a captured Portuguese slaver and landed by the Amersfoort, 28 March 1658; owned by Van Riebeeck, sold 1662, later to the Company; children Lysbeth (1667), Sara van Gijselen (1671), Christijn Pietersz, Magdalena (1677) and perhaps Jannetje van WijkH; died in the Slave Lodge before the end of 1732. No freedom, marriage or estate recorded. [FFY; originals it cites to pull]

These are working notes, not finished prose: they carry the reasoning, the corrections and the things still marked to verify. They are kept here so the page itself can read as what is known.

Die werksnotas op hierdie werf word in Engels gehou en word nie vertaal nie. Hulle verander met elke navorsingsessie, en 'n vertaling sou uit pas raak met die oorspronklike. Alles anders - die stories, die getranskribeerde dokumente en die koppelvlak - is in Afrikaans.

Oop vrae

FamilySearch ids for the enslaved and free-black ancestors, and for Anthony van de Kaap prioriteit 1 · LEAD-0112
Eleven people at the head of this family — the ten of S021 plus Catharina van PalliacattaM — and the one enslaved man in the family's own estate papers carry no FamilySearch id between them. Which of them have profiles, and what are the ids?

Wat dit sou uitmaak An id per person, or a recorded finding that no profile exists.
Import the nine Cape descent chains - they are Frans's own ancestry, generation 9 to 13 prioriteit 1 · LEAD-0116
Eight of S021's ten have no recorded child in this model, so the site names a descent it cannot walk. The private tree holds every chain. Importing them means about fifty new person rows across the de Wet, Mocke, Duminy, Snyman, van Dyk, Janse van Vuuren, Smuts and du Preez lines. Is that in scope?

Wat dit sou uitmaak Frans deciding. A middle course exists: import only the chains that reach families the site actually writes about, and leave the rest as a stated gap on the page.

Elders

FamilySearch-profiel GFCZ-RWL