Matthys Booyens
active 1868 · Booyens line
Verbinding met die Koup
Het grond in hierdie distrik gehou: Antjesfontein Nr. 14 (1868-09-25).
Name
- Baptismal name
- Matthys
- Given
- Matthys
- Surname
- Booyens
The formal baptismal name and the name a person was actually called are both kept, and neither is derived from the other. Spelling drift between records is evidence, not noise.
'n Lewe in die rekord
- 25 September 1868 grond Held it, Antjesfontein Nr. 14
Grond waarop hulle op rekord is
- Antjesfontein Nr. 14 held it · 25 September 1868 to 18 Oktober 1875
Wat ons nie weet nie
- Geen geboortedatum is aangeteken nie.
- Geen sterfdatum is aangeteken nie.
- Nie een ouer is aangeteken nie, dus hang hierdie mens nie aan die boom bo hom of haar nie.
A sourced gap beats an unsourced fill. These are the open questions on this person, stated rather than papered over.
Navorsingsnotas
[SRC-072] Antjesfontein No. 14 surveyed and granted to him 25 Sep 1868. Possibly the father or brother of Catharina Elizabeth Johanna BooyensM (PER-000087) [TO VERIFY].
These are working notes, not finished prose: they carry the reasoning, the corrections and the things still marked to verify. They are kept here so the page itself can read as what is known.
Die werksnotas op hierdie werf word in Engels gehou en word nie vertaal nie. Hulle verander met elke navorsingsessie, en 'n vertaling sou uit pas raak met die oorspronklike. Alles anders — die stories, die getranskribeerde dokumente en die koppelvlak — is in Afrikaans.
Wat die rekord kortkom
-
Holds ground once, and leaves no other trace at all
second order · B5 one-trace
Matthys BooyensH appears in exactly one land record and nowhere else, no birth, no death, no parents, no marriage, no burial, no estate. Who was this, and which family are they?
What would settle it A death notice (MOOC 6/9) names parents, spouse and children in one sheet and is the fastest way to attach an isolated landholder. Failing that, the baptism register for the district in the right decade.
Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand,
each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data.
The whole set is on the
questions page.