Modderdrift Nr. 239

239 op die kadaster · op rekord 2016 · wys op die kaart

Plaasnommer: Nr. 239
Op die kadaster: 239, heel plaasgeregistreer as MODDERDRIFT
Distrik: Prince Albert
Grootte, soos die kaart dit stel: 7101,2233 hektaar
Moderne opgemete oppervlakte: 7105.4 ha

Die historiese grootte en die moderne opgemete oppervlakte is twee aparte metings en word hier nie aangebied asof hulle mekaar bevestig nie. Die eerste is wat 'n landmeter op 'n kaart geskryf het, gewoonlik in morg. Die tweede is wat die moderne kadaster teken.

Waarom hierdie plaas hier is

'n Stuk van 'n plaas wat reeds in hierdie model is. 26 km van Klaarstroom.

perseel Consolidated out of Modderdrift Nr. 106 Gdlt 4
perseel Consolidated out of Annex Modderdrift (Rhemhoogte Nr. 125 Gdlt 3)
dokument 'n Dokument in die versameling beskryf hierdie grond DOC-0176
dokument 'n Dokument in die versameling beskryf hierdie grond DOC-0245
…en nog 1, volledig gelys verder af op hierdie bladsy.

Wat die rekord hou, in volgorde

2016 boundary change consolidation: from Modderdrift Nr. 106 Gdlt 4
2016 boundary change consolidation: from Annex Modderdrift (Rhemhoogte Nr. 125 Gdlt 3)
Oktober 2016 document SG diagram 2496/2016
CCT 27098/2017
Oktober 2016 document SG diagram 2496/2016 (sheet 2)
2016 document SG diagram verso 2496/2016 (verso)

Ook begrens deur, soos die moderne kadaster dit teken

Grond wat aan hierdie plaas raak op die Landmeter-generaal se huidige poligone en wat geen kaart wat hier gehou word, noem nie. Afgelei uit die meetkunde, nie van 'n dokument afgelees nie.

Dokumente

catalogued, no scan held

Landmeter-generaal-kaart, 2496/2016, Oktober 2016
11401100 farm 239.jpg

catalogued, no scan held

Landmeter-generaal-kaart, 2496/2016 (sheet 2), Oktober 2016
11401101.jpg

catalogued, no scan held

Kaart se keersy, 2496/2016 (verso), 2016
11401102.jpg

Kadaster

Die Landmeter-generaal se kaartindeks vir hierdie perseel

Navorsingsnotas

[3 Aug 2026, SRC-210] *** THIS DISSOLVES A TRAP THIS PROJECT SET FOR ITSELF. *** PAR-000099 warns: "SEPARATE TRAP: Prince Albert has a SECOND farm called MODDERDRIFT, No. 239 ... It is not this farm and the two must never be pooled - same class of error as the two Middelwaters." That warning was right to be careful and wrong about the reason. Farm 239 is not a namesake at all. It is a 2016 CONSOLIDATION OF TWO PIECES WE ALREADY HOLD: GEDEELTE 4 VAN MODDERDRIFT NR. 106 (our PAR-000125) and GEDEELTE 3 VAN RHEMHOOGTE NR. 125 (our PAR-000069, Annex Modderdrift). It is called Modderdrift because most of it IS Modderdrift. THE ARITHMETIC SETTLES IT: 7101,2233 total less the 2037,7683 of Rhemhoogte Ged 3 leaves 5063,46 ha for Modderdrift 106 Ged 4, against the 5069,9 ha our cadastre gives PAR-000125 - 6,4 ha apart, 0,13%. AND IT EXPLAINS SOMETHING ELSE. PAR-000125 carries WSTATUS=H in the cadastre and this project marked it "pinned-superseded" without knowing what superseded it. This did, in 2017.

[3 Aug 2026] Its verso shows a Gedeelte 1 of 2821,9159 ha struck off almost at once (kaart 2497/2016, deed 27099/17), leaving 4279,3074 ha of remainder. The farm was assembled and part of it sold in the same breath.

Werknotas, hier gewys omdat dit 'n private navorsingsbou is.

Die werksnotas op hierdie werf word in Engels gehou en word nie vertaal nie. Hulle verander met elke navorsingsessie, en 'n vertaling sou uit pas raak met die oorspronklike. Alles anders — die stories, die getranskribeerde dokumente en die koppelvlak — is in Afrikaans.

Oop vrae

Nine diagram sheets named in the model that no longer exist on disk prioriteit 2 · LEAD-0095
Re-pull nine Surveyor-General sheets whose archive references this model records but whose images were never kept. What do their versos carry?

Wat dit sou uitmaak Re-pulling the nine files. Each then gets its OWN DOC- row per 8, never a second filename on an existing row.

Wat die rekord kortkom

Nobody is on record as ever having held this third order · B8 never-held
Modderdrift Nr. 239 is in the model and drawn on the map, and carries no ownership record of any kind, not a grant, not a transfer, not an occupation.

What would settle it The Surveyor-General's diagram for the farm number names the grantee and the date; the deed reference on it opens the transfer chain.

Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand, each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data. The whole set is on the questions page.