family-tree 'JG Du Plessis 1826 (family-tree)' - 860 individuals, exported from MacFamilyTree
compiled tree · 'n afskrif, indeks of transkripsie · geraadpleeg 2026-08-23
- Soort
- compiled tree
- Bewaarplek
- Supplied by Frans Oosthuizen, dropped in the inbox; held privately, not published
- Verwysing
- family-tree 7.0.3, SOUR SyniumFamilyTree / MacFamilyTree 11.2.3. 860 individuals, 325 families.
- Geraadpleeg
- 2026-08-23
Die sitasie soos dit gegee is
Fetched to settle whether Jacobus Johannes Petrus du Plessis was Cecilia Maria's brother. IT DOES NOT CONTAIN THAT FAMILY, and the reason is recorded because the file looks as though it should. | ITS ONLY Johannes Gysbertus du Plessis is (FS L1HV-DXJ, since merged into LVT7-HF7): no birth date, no death date, no spouse, appearing solely as a CHILD of Daniel Jacobus du Plessis b. 3 Jan 1831 and Catharina Elizabeth Johanna Delport b. 1837. A father born 1831 cannot have a son born 1826, and that couple's earliest dated child is 1855. | OUR Johannes Gysbertus (1826-1913, KC34-PVM) is a son of Daniel Jacobus 1802-1879 and Susanna Johanna Catharina van der Westhuizen 1803-1852. NEITHER IS IN THE FILE. Its only van der Westhuizen died in 1698; it holds no Theron and no Jan Gysbert du Plessis of 1781. | *** AND IT CARRIES A CECILIA MARIA DU PLESSIS BORN 2 DECEMBER 1863 *** where ours is 9 January 1857 to 10 April 1895 - same name, same generation, wrong woman. That is the whole hazard of a name-matched id in one line. | Surname profile, for whoever meets this file again: Olivier 62, Oosthuizen 54, Klopper 52, Botha 50, van der Merwe 41, Delport 40 - and only 18 du Plessis. It is not a du Plessis tree. | The file itself is NOT published and its path is not recorded here: the leak gate refused the build over a family-tree path in this row, correctly - a private export has no business in a public payload. It is held in the project's own discard folder.
Woordeliks gehou. Hierdie projek weerspreek gepubliseerde genealogieë en stel 'n familie se eie mondelinge oorlewering reg, so elke bewering moet nagegaan kan word deur iemand wat nie in die vertrek was nie.
Niks in die model haal hierdie bron nog aan nie.