Rivervale (Klipgat Nr. 114 Gdlt 4)

4/114 op die kadaster · wys op die kaart

Die plaas se eie geskiedenis — die toekenning, die oorspronklike opmeting — sit op daardie bladsy.

Plaasnommer: Nr. 114
Gedeelte: 4
Ook aangeteken as: RivervaleDIAGRAM, deduction table on SG dgm 1200/1911, DOC-0159RiversvaleSRC-436, 2023 valuation roll
Op die kadaster: 4/114, gedeeltegeregistreer as KLIPGAT
Distrik: Prince Albert
Grootte, soos die kaart dit stel: 2,134 morgen 329 sq roods
Moderne opgemete oppervlakte: 961.5 ha

Die historiese grootte en die moderne opgemete oppervlakte is twee aparte metings en word hier nie aangebied asof hulle mekaar bevestig nie. Die eerste is wat 'n landmeter op 'n kaart geskryf het, gewoonlik in morg. Die tweede is wat die moderne kadaster teken.

Waarom hierdie plaas hier is

'n Stuk van 'n plaas wat reeds in hierdie model is. 32 km van Klaarstroom.

perseel Uitgesny uit Klipgat Nr. 114
grens Deel 'n grens met Voelfontein Nr. 213 Voelfontein Nr. 213

Wat die rekord hou, in volgorde

undated boundary change subdivision: from Klipgat Nr. 114

Ook begrens deur, soos die moderne kadaster dit teken

Grond wat aan hierdie plaas raak op die Landmeter-generaal se huidige poligone en wat geen kaart wat hier gehou word, noem nie. Afgelei uit die meetkunde, nie van 'n dokument afgelees nie.

Kadaster

Die Landmeter-generaal se kaartindeks vir hierdie perseel

Die Landmeter-generaal se kaartindeks vir die hele plaas — waar die oorspronklike opmeting van hierdie grond lê.

Navorsingsnotas

[1 Aug 2026 inbox] One of TEN near-equal subdivisions cut from Klipgat No. 114 and all registered in 1916 on consecutive deeds, from the deduction table on the reverse of SG Dgm 1200/1911 (DOC-0159). Named Rivervale on that table, 2,134 morgen 329 square roods, deed 1916-142-8825. THE SHAPE OF IT: nine of the ten are within four morgen of 2,137, and the tenth is a 10-morgen Lot A that is almost certainly a water or building site. Ten near-equal shares registered together, on an amended title issued to the ESTATE of the late Lucas Daniel Fromon van Zyl, is an estate being divided among heirs. The same pattern as Spreeufontein's three-way 1909 split, at ten times the width. [TO VERIFY] against the 1916 transfer deeds, which would name the heirs. The portion number comes from the order of the deed numbers (8820 to 8831 against portions 1 to 10), which agrees with the legible handwritten annotations; two of those annotations are not cleanly legible and rest on the order alone. The block also appears on the FACE of the 1911 diagram as a coloured internal division, so the ten were laid out before they were registered. MODERN EXTENT WILL NOT MATCH: the cadastre's ten Klipgat polygons total about 21,717 ha against the parent's 21,379 morgen (18,312 ha), and the cadastre also carries a 15/114 that is not on this sheet. Historic morgen and modern hectares are never quoted here as confirming each other. [1 Aug 2026]

AREA FLAG, LEFT OPEN ON PURPOSE: the cadastre's 4/114 is 1,151.0 ha against this block's 2,134 morgen (1,827.8 ha), a ratio of 0.54, while the other eight matched portions all come within about 3 per cent. Two readings and no way to choose between them here. Either 4/114 was cut down again after 1916, which is supported by the cadastre carrying a 15/114 of 3,556.7 ha that is not on the 1911 sheet at all, or Rivervale is not portion 4 and the deed-order inference is wrong for this one block. The CSG diagram index for 114 would settle it. [TO VERIFY]

[9 Aug 2026] THIS ROW'S TWO AREAS CONTRADICT EACH OTHER AND THE CADASTRE FIGURE IS THE ODD ONE. extent_text is 2,134 morgen 329 square roods, which is 1,828.3 ha, and it sits with the other nine 1916 shares: they run 2,134 to 2,138 morgen and their polygons run 1,822.9 to 1,853.7 ha. sg_area_ha on this row is 961.5 ha, 47% BELOW its own extent and roughly half a share, which no other portion of this farm is anywhere near. A near-equal share of a ten-way estate division does not come out at half the size of its nine siblings. THE LIKELIEST EXPLANATION IS A BAD CADASTRE MATCH: this row pinned to a sub-portion of Rivervale rather than to Rivervale. It is also half of farm 114's 9.8% shortfall on its own. [TO VERIFY] against the CSG polygon for 4/114.

Werknotas, hier gewys omdat dit 'n private navorsingsbou is.

Die werksnotas op hierdie werf word in Engels gehou en word nie vertaal nie. Hulle verander met elke navorsingsessie, en 'n vertaling sou uit pas raak met die oorspronklike. Alles anders — die stories, die getranskribeerde dokumente en die koppelvlak — is in Afrikaans.

Oop vrae

Six parcels whose surveyed extent is far from their polygon with no reason recorded prioriteit 2 · LEAD-0093
For each, is the extent mistyped, or did ground leave the farm without a note?

Wat dit sou uitmaak The deduction table. It lists portion, name, extent, diagram and deed on one line.

Wat die rekord kortkom

Nobody is on record as ever having held this third order · B8 never-held
Rivervale (Klipgat Nr. 114 Gdlt 4) is in the model and drawn on the map, and carries no ownership record of any kind, not a grant, not a transfer, not an occupation.

What would settle it The Surveyor-General's diagram for the farm number names the grantee and the date; the deed reference on it opens the transfer chain.

Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand, each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data. The whole set is on the questions page.