Deel van Vrolikheid
Uitkyk Nek (Vrolikheid Nr. 177 Gdlt 2)
· op rekord 1934–1936 · wys op die kaart
Die plaas se eie geskiedenis - die toekenning, die oorspronklike opmeting - sit op daardie bladsy.
- Plaasnommer
- Nr. 177
- Gedeelte
- 2
- Ook aangeteken as
- Uitkyk NekDIAGRAMVrolikheidSRC-436, 2023 valuation roll, which prints the parent farm name against this portion
- Distrik
- Prince Albert
- Moderne opgemete oppervlakte
- 268.8 ha
Waarom hierdie plaas hier is
Vincent Charles Marincowitz het dit gehou. 5 km van Klaarstroom.
Vincent Charles Marincowitz is regstreeks op hierdie grond aangeteken. Geen spoor nodig nie.
- storie 'n Geskrewe geskiedenis speel op hierdie grond af Vrolykheid's story
- perseel Uitgesny uit Vrolikheid
- perseel Related to Wit Plaats (Vrolikheid Nr. 177 Gdlt 1)
- perseel Related to: Marinco (Vrolikheid Nr. 177 Gdlt 3)
- …en nog 2, volledig gelys verder af op hierdie bladsy.
Stories
- about this farm
Vrolykheid se storie
Die plaas waar die papier en die mense verskil. Stretch se opmeting van 1833 dra al klaar die name van gedeeltes wat eers 'n eeu later gesny word; twee titels gaan op een dag in 1841 uit, een aan 'n Oosthuisen en een aan 'n 'N. Hitge' wie se akte deur vier latere gedeeltes aangehaal word; 'n Triëstenaar trou in 1844 met 'n Hitge en hou die plaas toe hy in 1890 sterf; en 'n sterfkennis sit die Hitges uiteindelik self op die grond.
Wat die rekord hou, in volgorde
- 1934 boundary change subdivision: from Vrolikheid
-
Julie 1934
document
SG diagram 4932/1934
11074
- 18 Desember 1935 boundary change held_together: from Wit Plaats (Vrolikheid Nr. 177 Gdlt 1)
- 18 Desember 1935 boundary change held_together: becomes Marinco (Vrolikheid Nr. 177 Gdlt 3)
-
18 Desember 1935
ownership
Vincent Charles Marincowitz (23 April 1877–6 Februarie 1950)
transfer · confidence high
- 24 Augustus 1936 boundary change held_together: becomes Faans Kraal (Vrolikheid Nr. 177 Gdlt 4)
Ook begrens deur, soos die moderne kadaster dit teken
Grond wat aan hierdie plaas raak op die Landmeter-generaal se huidige poligone en wat geen kaart wat hier gehou word, noem nie. Afgelei uit die meetkunde, nie van 'n dokument afgelees nie.
- E Vrolikheid
- E Wit Plaats (Vrolikheid Nr. 177 Gdlt 1)
- S Faans Kraal (Vrolikheid Nr. 177 Gdlt 4)
- NW De Claar Stroom (Klaarstroom Nr. 178)
Dokumente
Kadaster
Die Landmeter-generaal se kaartindeks vir hierdie perseel
Die Landmeter-generaal se kaartindeks vir die hele plaas, waar die oorspronklike opmeting van hierdie grond lê.
Navorsingsnotas
SG Dgm 4932/1934; deed 18.12.1935-11074 Transfer confirmed 18.12.1935 to V.C. Marincowitz (OWN-000053, DOC-0069). DOC-0069's own antecedent-title line names the 1841 N. HitgeM grant, not the Oosthuisen grant - see PAR-000014 and PAR-000035 [TO VERIFY].
[13 Aug 2026] Renamed to the one form this model uses for every portion - the portion's own name, then the parent farm, its number and the portion in brackets - so that a name is legible in a list, a search result and a map popup without the reader having to know which farm number is which. It read "Uitkyk Nek (Vrolykheid Ptn 2)" before. Nothing about the ground changed.
*** [23 Aug 2026] CUT ON PAPER, NEVER SPLIT ON THE GROUND. Frans, when the held-together flag surfaced this group: 'vrolikhyd might have been cut, but never split.' The documents say he is right. ***
VINCENT CHARLES MARINCOWITZ (PER-000045, 1877-1950) HELD ALL FOUR PORTIONS: Wit Plaats Ptn 1 from 30 Sept 1922 (deed 8479, diagram 4275/1921); Uitkyk Nek Ptn 2 AND Marinco Ptn 3 on the SAME DAY, 18 December 1935, ON THE SAME DEED 11074; and Faans Kraal Ptn 4 on 24 August 1936 (deed 8110).
THE SURVEYS GIVE IT AWAY. Portions 2, 3 and 4 were all framed in JULY 1934 and carry consecutive diagram numbers - 4932/1934, 4933/1934 and 4935/1934. One survey campaign, one farm, one man. The subdivision was a cadastral act and not a division of occupation.
AND HE DIED ON IT: 6 February 1950, on Vrolikheid (SRC-008).
TWO PORTIONS ON ONE DEED IS THE CLINCHER, because the cadastre itself treated 2 and 3 as a single transaction. The subdivision rule still gives each portion its own page and its own history, which is right - what this note records is that on the ground they were one farm.
Werknotas, hier gewys omdat dit 'n private navorsingsbou is.
Die werksnotas op hierdie werf word in Engels gehou en word nie vertaal nie. Hulle verander met elke navorsingsessie, en 'n vertaling sou uit pas raak met die oorspronklike. Alles anders - die stories, die getranskribeerde dokumente en die koppelvlak - is in Afrikaans.
Oop vrae
-
N. Hitge's true footprint on Vrolykheid - and his relationship to Frans's own Hitge ancestors
prioriteit 2 · LEAD-0009
Did N. HitgeM's 1841 title (B.W.Q.5.18) actually cover more of Vrolykheid than the ~2,177-morgen Wit Plaats portion recorded for him - and how is N. HitgeM (PER-000044) related to Aletta Catharina Maria Helena HitgeM (PER-000139, Frans's own direct 2x-great-grandmother) and to Hester Carolina Adriana HitgeM (PER-000178, who married into the Marincowitz line)?
Wat dit sou uitmaak A record giving N. HitgeM's full given name and naming his children, matched against Aletta Catharina Maria Helena HitgeM (b.1846) and Hester Carolina Adriana HitgeM (b.1826) - if both are his daughters, or one his daughter and the other a niece or cousin, that settles the family relationship and gives a documented reason one 1841 title could legitimately be cited across multiple later Vrolykheid portions, subdivided within the Hitge family before ever reaching Marincowitz hands
Wat die rekord kortkom
-
The record stops in 1935 and never resumes
third order · B2 trail-ends
Uitkyk Nek (Vrolikheid Nr. 177 Gdlt 2) was worked as far as 1935-12-18, with Vincent Charles MarincowitzL the last owner on record. 91 years follow with nothing. Who held it after that, and is it still one farm?
What would settle it The current title deed traced backwards, each transfer names the one before it, or the Surveyor-General's subdivision diagrams, which are what usually explain a farm going quiet.
Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand,
each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data.
The whole set is on the
questions page.